Evaluation of the Employers Sanctions Directive
Full official title
Evaluation of Directive 2009/52/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 June 2009 providing for minimum standards on sanctions and measures against employers of illegally staying third-country nationalsclosed Open for answers from 27 Jul 2026 to 18 Sep 2026. Answer on the Commission's site. Topics: Migration and asylum.
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission will launch an evaluation of the Employers Sanctions Directive (Directive 2009/52/EC) between Q2 2026 and Q1 2027 to assess whether it remains fit for purpose, effective, efficient, relevant, coherent, and provides EU added value. The evaluation will assess the application and impact of provisions concerning prevention, inspections, administrative and criminal sanctions, and protective safeguards for illegally staying third-country workers across 25 Member States for the period 2012-2025. It will also examine cross-border cooperation, document fraud, effects on labour exploitation, and the administrative burden placed on Member States and employers. The findings will provide the basis for the Commission to determine whether to propose a revision of the Directive and carry out a subsequent impact assessment, or whether no revision is necessary.
- The evaluation covers the implementation and enforcement of Directive 2009/52/EC from 2012 to 2025 across the 25 participating Member States (excluding Denmark and Ireland).
- The assessment will focus on provisions relating to inspections, administrative and criminal sanctions, subcontracting liability, prevention measures, and protective safeguards such as complaints mechanisms and back payments.
- The initiative addresses shortcomings identified in the May 2026 implementation report, notably uneven inspection coverage, varying application of sanctions, and uncertain protection of workers' rights.
- The evaluation will analyse coherence with the European Labour Authority's mandate, the Seasonal Workers Directive implementation, and EU actions countering human trafficking for labour exploitation.
- It will evaluate administrative burden on Member States and employers, exploring potential scope for simplification.
- Findings will determine whether the Commission decides to revise the Directive with an accompanying impact assessment or maintain the existing framework.
Affected, as named in the text: Employers; SMEs; Third-country nationals staying in the EU illegally; Member States; Enforcement authorities; Labour inspectorates; Social partners; Representative SME organisations and business associations; Scientific researchers, academic organisations, learned societies and scientific associations; EU agencies and expert groups.
What is asked: The Commission invites feedback to collect evidence on the implementation, effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence, and EU added value of the Directive, including practical experiences regarding enforcement, sanctions, inspections, and administrative burdens. Representative SME organisations and business associations are asked to provide views on the impact on SMEs. In addition, scientific researchers, academic organisations, learned societies, and scientific associations are invited to submit published and pre-print research, data, analyses, and syntheses of the current state of knowledge in labour migration, labour market regulation, and labour exploitation.
Summary written from 13 passages of the Commission document by gemini-3.8-flash-low on 3 Oct 2026; cached and shared by every organisation.
Dossier summary from the portal
The Commission will launch an evaluation of the Directive in 2026 to determine whether it remains fit for purpose and what lessons can be learned to improve its effectiveness. The evaluation will also analyse the efficiency and continuing relevance of the Directive and will stress-test it to ensure that it remains relevant and fit for purpose. Based on the evaluation, the Commission will consider whether to amend or clarify the current legal framework.
Commission documents: Evaluation of Directive 2009/52/EC of the European Parliament and the... (EN, 5 pages).
Who has already answered
37 submissions in the snapshot (28 from organisations), portal total 37. Feedback list on the portal.
28 of 28 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 2 supports 5 wants changes 18 3 held back for review (low confidence).
-
Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de Género. Ministerio de Igualdad de España. Public authority, ESP model reads as: wants changes source
- Incorporate the protection of victims' rights into the upcoming evaluation of the Employers Sanctions Directive.
That is why we consider it essential that a future evaluation of the Directive take into account the impact that this regulation has on the protection of victims’ rights.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Assess safeguards in complaint mechanisms and remove conditions making victim support dependent on cooperation with law enforcement.
In this regard, we consider it essential to review this aspect and for the Directive to be aligned with European standards on combating trafficking and exploitation of human beings, which establish a clear mandate not to make assistance and support conditional on collaboration with law enforcement and judicial authorities.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Ensure worker protection takes precedence over migration control during labour inspections.
From the point of view of combating trafficking and labour exploitation with a victim-centred approach, worker protection should take precedence over migration control mechanisms.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
- Incorporate the protection of victims' rights into the upcoming evaluation of the Employers Sanctions Directive.
-
Fagbevægelsens Hovedorganisation - Danish Trade Union Confederation Trade union, DNK; register: Trade unions and professional associations model reads as: wants changes source
- Increase focus on the inspection and enforcement of the rules.
Thus, more focus on the inspection and enforcement of the rules is necessary.
- Further develop recital 28 and articles 13 and 14 to facilitate actual enforcement.
The directives recital 28, as well as articles 13 and 14 must be developed further and facilitate the actual enforcement of the rules.
- Increase focus on the inspection and enforcement of the rules.
-
- Examine the possibility of revising the European legal framework.
Therefore, we support a thorough evaluation of Directive 2009/52/EC and consider that the possibility of revising the Directive should be examined.
- Emphasize digital data exchange and interoperability between competent national authorities.
Therefore, any future revision of the Directive should place greater emphasis on digital data exchange and interoperability between the competent national authorities, while ensuring full compliance with data protection rules.
- Consider introducing European rules on subcontracting chain liability, due diligence, and claim recovery.
In the context of the revision of the Directive, consideration should be given to the possibility of introducing: - minimum European rules concerning liability throughout subcontracting chains; - an obligation for the main contractor to carry out an appropriate level of due diligence; - clear rules concerning the establishment of knowledge or fault; - liability where subcontractors are knowingly used to circumvent the applicable rules; - effective access for workers to the recovery of their claims.
- Examine the possibility of revising the European legal framework.
-
- Adopt a practical guidance document to reduce implementation disparities across Member States.
There is a need to adopt a practical guidance document aimed at reducing the existing disparities between Member States and ensuring a consistent level of implementation of EU legislation.
- Strengthen inspection mechanisms through systematic and targeted risk-assessment methods.
The effectiveness of the Directive could be enhanced through more systematic and targeted inspections, making use of modern risk-assessment methods.
- Publish an information guide for third-country nationals to clarify their rights.
We propose the publication of a relevant Information Guide for Third-Country Nationals.
- Adopt a practical guidance document to reduce implementation disparities across Member States.
-
- Focus the evaluation on identifying implementation gaps and clarifying existing protective provisions.
The evaluation should therefore first focus on identifying and addressing these gaps and on clarifying how the existing protective provisions should work in practice.
- Ensure undocumented workers can safely report violations and recover unpaid wages.
The European Commission should support Member States in strengthening the national implementation of the Employers Sanctions Directive by ensuring that undocumented workers can safely report violations and effectively recover unpaid wages.
- Assess post-inspection outcomes such as information access, support referral, and wage recovery.
The evaluation should therefore ask what happens after an inspection: Are workers informed of their rights? Are they referred to independent support? Can they submit a claim? How many claims are pursued, what amounts are awarded, and how much is actually recovered?
- Focus the evaluation on identifying implementation gaps and clarifying existing protective provisions.
-
ETUC Trade union, BEL; register: Trade unions and professional associations model reads as: wants changes source
- Prioritize correct enforcement of existing protective provisions rather than reopening the Directive for legislative revision.
Therefore, we believe that the priority must be the correct enforcement of the existing protective provisions, particularly on access to complaint mechanisms, back payments, residence permits and information through funding, monitoring and, where necessary, infringement procedures.
- Implement effective firewalls between labour inspectorates and immigration authorities.
Effective firewalls between labour inspectorates and immigration authorities must be implemented as well as a ban on the transfer of workers' data to immigration services without consent.
- Clarify that Member States should decouple residence permits from criminal proceedings for workers pursuing labour claims.
The Commission should clarify that Member States should decouple permits from criminal proceedings and grant them to workers pursuing labour complaints, using existing discretion under the Directive and national prerogative.
- Prioritize correct enforcement of existing protective provisions rather than reopening the Directive for legislative revision.
-
SIIS - Social Information and Investigation Service Public authority, BEL model reads as: wants changes source
- Specify recorded units and scopes to improve statistical comparability across inspections under Article 14.
In order to assess the effectiveness of Article 14, it would be useful to specify the unit and scope recorded, to report methodological breaks and to link, where possible, the checks, the employers and workers concerned, the illegally staying third-country nationals detected and the follow-up given.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Examine common definitions and indicators for monitoring while avoiding unnecessary administrative burden.
The evaluation could examine whether a limited number of common definitions and indicators would allow better monitoring of the application of the Directive, from detection to enforcement of sanctions.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Strengthen the role of the Commission in facilitating cross-border cooperation and risk analyses.
A stronger role for the Commission could support this cooperation through IJCs, exchanges of practices, support for risk analyses, etc.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
- Specify recorded units and scopes to improve statistical comparability across inspections under Article 14.
-
EFFE Other, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: wants changes source
- Explicitly recognise the household employer as a distinct category within the EU policy framework.
EFFE also considers that the EU policy framework should explicitly recognise the household employer as a distinct category of employer.
- Encourage Member States to introduce one-stop-shop systems and simplified administrative declaration tools for households.
Member States should be encouraged to provide one-stop-shop systems enabling households to declare employment, manage wages and social contributions, fulfil tax obligations and access relevant information.
- Promote financial incentives such as tax credits and deductions to encourage formal employment.
EFFE calls on the Commission to recognise the specific situation of household employment and the household employer, strengthen simplified administrative and digital tools for declaration, and encourage financial incentives such as tax credits and deductions.
- Explicitly recognise the household employer as a distinct category within the EU policy framework.
-
Confédération Générale du Travail - CGT Trade union, FRA; register: Trade unions and professional associations model reads as: wants changes source
- Facilitate access to residence permits for workers where there is evidence of employment.
Facilitating access to residence permits, in particular for workers where there is evidence of work.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Establish the legal liability of principals in subcontracting chains.
Recognition of the liability of principals.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Limit the number of subcontracting tiers.
Limiting the number of sub-contracting levels.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
- Facilitate access to residence permits for workers where there is evidence of employment.
-
- Allocate dedicated financial resources to support designated complaint mechanisms.
Any revision should therefore provide dedicated financial support for complaint mechanisms.
- Establish stronger legal safeguards against detention and return for undocumented workers reporting abuses.
The Directive should therefore introduce stronger safeguards for undocumented workers who report labour rights violations or exploitation.
- Clarify residence permit entitlements during proceedings for undocumented workers suffering labour exploitation outside human trafficking.
The directive should therefore further clarify the right to residence permit during the proceedings for undocumented TCW who have lodged a complaint and who are, or were, in a situation of labour exploitation other than human trafficking.
- Allocate dedicated financial resources to support designated complaint mechanisms.
-
DigitalTrade4.EU Other, EST; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: wants changes source
- Assess whether established facts can remain usable across stages without unnecessary re-collection.
The core question is whether facts already established by a competent authority can remain attributable, current and usable at later stages without unnecessary re-collection or re-verification.
- Maintain a strict separation between discoverability of records and access to their content.
Discoverability of a relevant record should remain distinct from access to its contents.
- Focus on better organizational coordination and proportionate reuse rather than creating a new EU database.
Digital tools are treated only as one possible enabler: the primary objective is better organisational coordination, clearer procedures and proportionate reuse of existing evidence, not the creation of a new EU database or technical architecture.
- Assess whether established facts can remain usable across stages without unnecessary re-collection.
-
- Improve the practical application and enforcement of the Directive rather than amending its core text.
We therefore focus our efforts on improving its practical application and on clear lines of interpretation addressed to national authorities.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
- Improve the practical application and enforcement of the Directive rather than amending its core text.
-
- Evaluate and ensure the practical enforcement of claims for unpaid wages and employment rights.
The practical enforcement of claims for outstanding wages and other employment-related rights.
- Assess whether existing complaint mechanisms allow safe reporting without adverse consequences for workers.
Consideration should be given to whether existing mechanisms genuinely enable affected individuals to safely report cases of labour exploitation or illegal employment without fear of disproportionate consequences for their legal or personal situation.
- Assess the effectiveness and deterrent impact of ancillary sanctions beyond financial penalties.
The evaluation should not focus solely on financial penalties but should also assess the use of other measures provided for in the Directive, such as exclusion from access to public subsidies, grants, public support schemes or public procurement procedures.
- Evaluate and ensure the practical enforcement of claims for unpaid wages and employment rights.
-
Ministry of the Economy, Labour and Sport Public authority, SVN model reads as: wants changes source
- Conduct an evidence-based evaluation focusing on practical implementation and enforcement.
Slovenia considers that the evaluation should be evidence-based and should take into account not only the existence of the relevant legal provisions at national level, but also their practical implementation and enforcement.
- Identify whether provisions require clarification or adaptation to reflect developments in labor markets and migration patterns.
At the same time, the evaluation should identify whether certain provisions require clarification or adaptation in light of developments in migration patterns, labour markets, forms of employment and subcontracting, as well as the increasing need for effective cross-border cooperation.
- Conduct an evidence-based evaluation focusing on practical implementation and enforcement.
-
- Ensure any amendments do not impose additional administrative burdens on compliant businesses.
Any amendments to the Directive should be proportionate and should not impose additional administrative burdens on businesses that already comply with the rules.
- Protect employers acting in good faith from sanctions due to unknown changes in employee status.
At the same time, it is important that employers who have acted in good faith and fulfilled their verification obligations are not subject to sanctions as a result of changes to an employee's residence or work permit status that are unknown to the employer.
- Focus on improved digital solutions and information sharing between authorities and employers.
The emphasis should instead be on improved information sharing and digital solutions between national authorities and employers.
- Ensure any amendments do not impose additional administrative burdens on compliant businesses.
-
- Launch EU-level awareness-raising campaigns on rights, obligations, and legal consequences.
As regards other elements that could contribute to further improve the Directive's effectiveness, we appreciate that Member States could be supported in its implementation by launching, at EU level, of awareness-raising campaigns targeting both employers and employees, focusing on their rights and obligations, as well as on the consequences of non-compliance with the law in this area.
- Develop best-practice guides and dedicated staff training courses.
Other measures could include the development of a best-practice guide and dedicated training courses for the staff involved.
- Launch EU-level awareness-raising campaigns on rights, obligations, and legal consequences.
-
PICUM NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: opposes source
- Refrain from opening a legislative revision of the Directive in the current political context.
Finally, we would have serious concerns that any revision of the directive in the current political context would take a counterproductive and repressive direction regarding, rather than strengthening, the protection of undocumented workers, and therefore strongly advise against revising the directive.
- Prioritise guidance and support for national authorities to address implementation barriers rather than amending the law.
While certain provisions could be strengthened in law, we would recommend efforts be invested in addressing these barriers to promote effective implementation of the existing provisions.
- Focus enforcement on penalising employers for rights violations, tax evasion, and abusive practices.
Efforts should focus on sanctioning employers for violating workers rights, for tax and social security evasion and for abuses, and measures to increase accountability and financial liability in practice, to close the loopholes that employers use to evade payment.
- Refrain from opening a legislative revision of the Directive in the current political context.
-
- Place a stronger emphasis on protective measures such as safe reporting, access to remedy, and accountability across subcontracting chains in the evaluation.
IOM welcomes the Employers Sanctions Directive evaluation and recommends it places a stronger emphasis on protective measures, including assessing whether the Directive enables safe reporting, effective access to information, justice, remedy and redress, while ensuring accountability across recruitment and subcontracting chains and coherence with relevant EU acquis.
- Make residence permits accessible for proceedings without conditioning assistance on formal human trafficking identification or criminal cooperation.
Access to residence permits should be available where needed for proceedings or effective remedy, without making information, complaint support or wage recovery dependent on trafficking identification or criminal cooperation.
- Evaluate the Directive for coherence with related EU legal frameworks on trafficking, labour mobility, and corporate due diligence.
Finally, the evaluation should assess the Directives coherence with related Union frameworks on trafficking, labour mobility, undeclared work, victims rights, corporate due diligence and forced labour.
- Place a stronger emphasis on protective measures such as safe reporting, access to remedy, and accountability across subcontracting chains in the evaluation.
-
La Strada International NGO, NLD; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: wants changes source
- Examine the establishment of a clear firewall between labour enforcement and immigration control.
The evaluation should therefore examine the need for a clear firewall between labour-rights enforcement and immigration control, ensuring that workers seeking protection or remedies are not exposed to immigration consequences.
- Prioritise the effective practical implementation of the existing Directive before pursuing legislative revisions.
La Strada Internationals central recommendation is to prioritise effective implementation of the existing Directive before pursuing legislative revision.
- Broaden accountability across complex subcontracting and recruitment arrangements.
Accountability should extend, where appropriate, beyond immediate employers to recruiters, intermediaries, contractors and other actors benefiting from abusive arrangements.
- Examine the establishment of a clear firewall between labour enforcement and immigration control.
-
- Enhance practical effectiveness through improved information exchange, oversight, and cross-border cooperation.
Bulgaria has transposed the key requirements, but practical effectiveness could be enhanced through better information exchange, a clearer distinction between migration status and the right to work, more effective employer oversight, and improved cross-border cooperation.
- Enhance practical effectiveness through improved information exchange, oversight, and cross-border cooperation.
-
Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security and Migration Public authority, ESP model reads as: supports source
- Strengthen labor standards in vulnerable sectors to combat human trafficking and exploitation.
Furthermore, provision is made for strengthening labor standards in the most vulnerable sectorsan essential step for preventing exploitationand for taking action against human trafficking and exploitation linked to migration processes.
- Strengthen labor standards in vulnerable sectors to combat human trafficking and exploitation.
-
- Strengthen information exchange and cooperation among Member States.
The strengthening of cooperation among Member States to address this phenomenon through the exchange of information between the authorities involved in the implementation of the Directive.
- Place particular emphasis on investigating labor trafficking cases to protect rights.
Particular emphasis should be placed on investigating such cases with tangible results in order to protect their rights.
- Provide Commission guidelines and new methods to support high-risk sector inspections.
In this regard, the role of the Commission is significant in providing general guidelines, instructions, new methods, and techniques that will support Member States in detecting illegal employment in high-risk sectors.
- Strengthen information exchange and cooperation among Member States.
-
Centre for Migration Law, Radboud University Academic or research institution, NLD model reads as: wants changes source
- Improve the implementation of the Employers Sanctions Directive to ensure Member States protect migrant workers effectively.
Simply put: the European Commission could and should improve the (implementation of) the Employers Sanctions Directive in order to make the Member States provide effective protection to migrant workers.
- Improve the implementation of the Employers Sanctions Directive to ensure Member States protect migrant workers effectively.
-
- Reopen the consultation to redraft unclear concepts.
These are unclear concepts to be redrafted by reopening the consultation.
machine translation by the Commission, original in IT
- Reopen the consultation to redraft unclear concepts.
-
The Smile of the Child NGO, GRC; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: supports source
Who met the cabinets on the subject
60 meetings by subject similarity, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra | eBay EU liaison office (Companies & groups) | Discussion on the implementation and functioning of Council Directive (EU) 2021/514 ‘DAC7’ |
| 26 May 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | BUSINESSEUROPE (Trade and business associations) | Review of the EU ETS Directive |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | EUROGAS (Trade and business associations) | Implementation of EU legislation |
| 11 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Human Bridge Stiftelse (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Energiföretagen / Swedenergy (Trade and business associations); Stora Enso Oyj (Companies & groups); Avfall Sverige (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on implementation of EU legislation. |
| 3 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Raffaele Fitto | UniCredit (Companies & groups) | General discussion on the priorities of the European Commission |
| 30 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Finnish trade union representation to the EU (Trade unions and professional associations); Danish Trade Union Confederation EU Office (Trade unions and professional associations); Brussels Office of the Swedish Trade Unions (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives. |
| 26 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 4 Nov 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | European Federation of Public Service Unions (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 21 Oct 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 12 Dec 2024 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Ericsson (Companies & groups) | discussion on the priorities of the new Commission |
| 19 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Compagnie de SAINT-GOBAIN (Companies & groups); Lysios Public Affairs (Professional consultancies) | Exchange of views on the revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 28 Jan 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (Trade and business associations); Motorola Solutions Incorporated (Companies & groups); GE Vernova (Companies & groups); Merck Sharp & Dohme Europe Belgium SRL (Companies & groups); Excelerate Energy (Companies & groups); Magna Services of America, Inc. (Companies & groups); ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical (Companies & groups); Stryker (Companies & groups); Marriott International (Companies & groups); Intuitive Surgical, Inc (Companies & groups); JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on the priorities of the current Commission |
| 8 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque | Zentraler Immobilien Ausschuss (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the Commission's ongoing work in the areas of financial services and banking regulation |
| 14 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) | BDI-Proposal: European regulation establishing uniform European administrative procedural rules for permitting and notification procedures |
| 16 Jan 2025 | Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu | Danish Trade Union Confederation EU Office (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming Commission initiatives |
| 16 Jan 2025 | Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu | Confederation of Danish Employers (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming Commission initiatives |
| 30 Sep 2025 | Commissioner Christophe Hansen | FSC International Center GmbH (IC) (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Exploring the Role of Certification in EU Policy Delivery |
| 16 Feb 2026 | Commissioner Dan Jørgensen | Investor AB (Companies & groups); ABG Sundal Collier (Companies & groups); Traction (Companies & groups); Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (Companies & groups); Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (Companies & groups); Swedbank AB (publ) (Companies & groups); Stift. Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (Companies & groups); Ålandsbanken (Companies & groups) | Commission’s priorities |
| 3 Dec 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Visa Europe (Companies & groups) | Commission’s priorities |
| 5 Jun 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Independent Retail Europe (formerly UGAL - Union of Groups of Independent Retailers of Europe) (Trade and business associations) | The Commission's implementation and simplification agenda |
| 1 Jul 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | FOMENT DEL TREBALL NACIONAL (Trade and business associations) | Priorities of the New Commission |
| 4 Mar 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | SAP (Companies & groups); ASML Netherlands B.V. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on the Commission’s priorities under the current mandate, with an emphasis on simplification and competitiveness. |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Google Ireland Limited and its affiliates (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on the Commission’s priorities under the current mandate, with an emphasis on simplification and competitiveness. |
| 1 Oct 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the Commission’s priorities under the current mandate, with an emphasis on simplification and competitiveness. |
| 3 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | European Round Table for Industry (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the Commission’s priorities under the current mandate, with an emphasis on simplification and competitiveness. |
| 19 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | EUROCHAMBRES - Association of European Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the Commission’s priorities under the current mandate, with an emphasis on simplification and competitiveness. |
| 10 Dec 2024 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) | priorities of the new Commission |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | PayPal Limited, Belgium Branch (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on ongoing and planned Commission’s initiatives |
| 23 Jan 2025 | Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque | Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (Companies & groups) | Introductory meeting focusing on EU sanctions policy and EU regulations |
| 21 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Costas Kadis | European Marine Board (Think tanks and research institutions) | New Commission mandate & the work of the EMB |
Showing 30 of 60.