Evaluation of the European Environment Agency & the European Environment Information & Observation Network for 2022-2026
Full official title
Evaluation of the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (EIONET) 2022-2026closed Open for answers from 27 Jul 2026 to 21 Sep 2026. Answer on the Commission's site. Topics: Environment.
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission is launching an evaluation of the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (EIONET) covering the period from 2022 to 2026. The evaluation will assess the performance of both bodies in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence, and EU added value against the objectives of the EEA Regulation and work programmes. It will also examine the EEA's role within the EU institutional framework, its governance arrangements, operational functioning, and the sunset clause mentioned in the Common Approach on EU decentralised agencies. An external contractor will support the assessment using desk research, performance indicators, and stakeholder consultations, leading to a Commission staff working document planned for Q1 2028.
- Evaluates the performance of the EEA and Eionet across the 2022-2026 period based on better regulation criteria.
- Examines the EEA's organizational structure, operational functioning, and governance arrangements for funding, budgeting, supervision, and management.
- Assesses progress made since the previous evaluation covering 2017-2021 and considers the sunset clause from the Common Approach on EU decentralised agencies.
- Analyses the contribution of both organisations to EU environmental and climate policies and legislation.
- Utilises an external contractor study combining quantitative and qualitative methods, desk research, and performance indicators.
- Includes a consultation strategy with a targeted survey in Q2 2027, ad hoc expert surveys in Q2-Q3 2027, and targeted interviews in Q1-Q3 2027, concluding with a synopsis report.
Affected, as named in the text: EU institutions; Member States; Scientific community; Civil society; Commission end users of EEA products; National authorities.
What is asked: Stakeholders are invited to share their views through the call for evidence to provide information and feedback on different aspects of the EEA's and Eionet's work, including performance, outcomes, and impacts in relation to the evaluation criteria.
Summary written from 7 passages of the Commission document by gemini-3.8-flash-low on 3 Oct 2026; cached and shared by every organisation.
Dossier summary from the portal
The evaluation of the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (EIONET) is conducted in line with the Commission's Better Regulation and the Common Approach on EU decentralised agencies. The objectives of this evaluation are to: • analyse the performance of EEA/EIONET. • measure their efficiency. • assess the relevance and coherence of activities against the overall EU environmental policy priorities. • demonstrate the generated added value.
Commission documents: Evaluation of the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European... (EN, 2 pages).
Who has already answered
39 submissions in the snapshot (28 from organisations), portal total 39. Feedback list on the portal.
28 of 28 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 10 wants changes 16 2 held back for review (low confidence).
-
- Environmental reporting should better integrate socio-economic information and fisheries sector knowledge.
From the perspective of the fisheries sector, there is an opportunity to strengthen the integration of socio-economic information and the practical knowledge held by commercial fishermen alongside environmental monitoring and scientific datasets.
- Collaboration between the EEA, EIONET, fisheries stakeholders, national authorities, and research bodies should be increased.
Greater collaboration between the EEA, EIONET, fisheries stakeholders, national authorities, and research organisations would improve both the quality of environmental assessments and stakeholder confidence in the evidence used to support policy decisions.
- Data collection consistency should be encouraged and transparency in marine policy incorporation improved.
Future work should also encourage more consistent data collection across Member States and improve transparency regarding how environmental information is incorporated into EU marine policy and planning processes.
- Environmental reporting should better integrate socio-economic information and fisheries sector knowledge.
-
- The EEA and Eionet assessment must consider practical data usefulness for territories and river basins.
The CNSBII considers that the assessment of the European Environment Agency and Eionet should take into account not only the quantity of data produced, but above all their practical usefulness for understanding what is happening in the territories and river basins.
machine translation by the Commission, original in IT - Interoperability, metadata, time series, and traceability across fragmented environmental databases should be strengthened.
We therefore consider it necessary to strengthen interoperability, metadata, time series and traceability.
machine translation by the Commission, original in IT - The evaluation should incorporate the role and data of citizen science and civic monitoring.
The evaluation should also consider the role of citizen science and civic monitoring.
machine translation by the Commission, original in IT
- The EEA and Eionet assessment must consider practical data usefulness for territories and river basins.
-
Merman Conservation Expeditions Ltd Company, GBR; register: Professional consultancies model reads as: wants changes source
- Clear pathways should be established to connect external observations and citizen science with European environmental information systems.
The EEA and EIONET could develop clearer pathways for externally generated observations to contribute to European knowledge after appropriate validation, metadata requirements and quality-control procedures.
- Environmental information should be provided via open, machine-readable formats and interoperable APIs.
Environmental information should increasingly be available through open, machine-readable formats, interoperable APIs and clearly documented datasets.
- The evaluation should examine the latency of moving from observation to policy-relevant knowledge.
The evaluation should also consider the speed at which information moves from observation to policy-relevant knowledge.
- Clear pathways should be established to connect external observations and citizen science with European environmental information systems.
-
- Coordination between different European reporting regulatory frameworks should be improved.
Better coordination between these different regulatory frameworks would be an important lever to improve the overall efficiency of the system.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Interoperability between European reporting flows and INSPIRE national spatial data infrastructures must be enhanced.
It would be particularly useful to enhance interoperability between European reporting flows and the national spatial data infrastructures developed under INSPIRE.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Automated data transmission through APIs and the reuse of existing regulatory data should be explored.
The evaluation could also explore possibilities for automated data transmission through APIs and interoperable services, as well as ways to enhance the re-use of data already produced under other European regulatory obligations.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
- Coordination between different European reporting regulatory frameworks should be improved.
-
Environment Agency Austria - National Focal Point EEA/EIONET Other, AUT; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: supports source
- Reliable long-term funding and greater recognition of member country contributions are required to maintain EIONET.
To maintain and strengthen EIONET, reliable long-term funding is essential, as well as greater recognition of member countries contributions.
- Clearer governance is required to manage processes effectively while staying responsive to evolving priorities.
Clearer governance are needed to manage these processes effectively.
- A comprehensive external evaluation of the EIONET structure, including its Topic Centers, must be conducted.
In addition, a comprehensive external evaluation of the EIONET structure incl. TCs is needed.
- Reliable long-term funding and greater recognition of member country contributions are required to maintain EIONET.
-
WWF European Policy Office NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: supports source
- Reaffirm and protect the scientific independence and integrity of the EEA.
Reaffirm and protect the EEA's scientific independence and integrity.
- Strengthen the systematic integration of EEA evidence throughout the policy cycle.
Strengthen the integration of EEA evidence throughout the policy cycle.
- Ensure the EEA and Eionet receive adequate and sustainable funding and staffing.
Ensure the EEA and Eionet are adequately and sustainably resourced, with funding and staffing that keep pace with its mandate across inter alia climate, nature, water, oceans, land-use, and pollution.
- Reaffirm and protect the scientific independence and integrity of the EEA.
-
- Modify the overall methodology for presenting bathing water quality data.
We request a modification of the overall data presentation methodology.
- Modify the overall methodology for presenting bathing water quality data.
-
- Take into account broader classification aspects beyond the proportion of excellent bathing waters when communicating results.
Other relevant aspects of the classification, including the proportion of bathing waters meeting the applicable requirements and the proportion classified as poor, should also be taken into account when communicating the overall situation.
- Provide practical training, workshops, and guidance on data reporting and presentation.
We would also appreciate and strongly support the provision of more practical training, workshops and guidance on data reporting and data presentation.
- Take into account broader classification aspects beyond the proportion of excellent bathing waters when communicating results.
-
- The evaluation should verify which promised improvements have actually impacted the daily work and burden of national reporters.
The evaluation should establish which promised improvements have actually changed the daily work of national reporters.
- National data providers should be given an active role in designing the data collection systems.
Those producing the data should have a meaningful voice in designing the systems used to collect them.
- The EEA should guarantee adequate expert support to national reporters during deadlines.
Countries cannot become unavailable when a legal deadline approaches; EEA should ensure adequate expert support too.
- The evaluation should verify which promised improvements have actually impacted the daily work and burden of national reporters.
-
European Water Association (EWA) NGO, DEU; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: supports source
- The EEA and Eionet should maintain their role and be equipped after 2026 to deliver an integrated view of the European water cycle.
After 2026, they should be equipped to provide an integrated, timely and practically usable picture of Europes water cycle and its pressures.
- Coherent water monitoring should be supported through practitioner ties, digital skills, and stable funding commensurate with their mandate.
This requires coherent monitoring of water resilience, pollution prevention and source control, stronger links with practitioner networks, investment in digital and water-sector skills, and stable resources proportionate to the mandate.
- The EEA and Eionet should maintain their role and be equipped after 2026 to deliver an integrated view of the European water cycle.
-
- Maintain continuous cooperation and data exchange between UNEP and the EEA across global and regional assessments.
UNEP looks forward to continuous cooperation and exchanges with EEA from global assessments to specific regional reports or initiatives.
- Ensure the EEA and EIONET continue to provide environmental data and knowledge to inform European policymaking amid accelerating climate change.
With accelerating climate change and environmental degradation with severe impacts on health, well-being, livelihoods and all sectors of the economy, also and increasingly in Europe, EEAs and EIONETs work is even more important than ever before to continue providing data and knowledge to inform European policy and legislation to be able to address the very complex interconnected challenges and thereby improve Europes resilience, security and prosperity.
- Maintain continuous cooperation and data exchange between UNEP and the EEA across global and regional assessments.
-
SEO/BirdLife NGO, ESP; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: supports source
- Assess the effective usefulness, quality, accessibility, and responsiveness of EEA and Eionet outputs during the evaluation.
The 2022-2026 evaluation should therefore assess not only the volume of products generated, but also their effective usefulness for the design, monitoring, implementation and evaluation of European policies; its scientific and technical quality; their accessibility, timeliness, comparability and re-use; and the ability of the Agency and the network to respond to new needs for environmental information.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Safeguard the EEA's technical independence and provide sufficient resources while preventing reporting simplifications from degrading data quality.
In this framework, SEO/BirdLife considers it necessary to preserve and strengthen the EEA’s technical independence and ability to produce objective evidence-based analyses. It is also necessary to ensure adequate human, technical and financial resources for the increasing scope of its functions and to avoid that possible processes of simplification of reporting obligations result in a loss of quality, detail, spatial coverage, temporal continuity or ability to detect environmental changes.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Advance data interoperability, open access, and capacity to connect biodiversity knowledge with sectoral policies.
Further progress should be made on data interoperability and re-use, open access to information and transparent communication of uncertainties and knowledge gaps. In particular, we consider it important to maintain and strengthen the capacity to generate knowledge about biodiversity and ecosystems, including the pressures that explain their deterioration, and to connect this information with sectoral policies such as agriculture, energy, water, fisheries, transport or land use.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
- Assess the effective usefulness, quality, accessibility, and responsiveness of EEA and Eionet outputs during the evaluation.
-
- Improve dataset auditing, completeness, relevance, and access with error-reporting feedback mechanisms.
Attention must be paid to more effective datasets auditing, completeness and relevance, while verification of outcomes should require causal relations analysis at different levels to link statistical data with local/regional realities. Access to datasets must be simple, providing feedback mechanisms to report errors or incoherences in it.
- Integrate socio-economic data and practical sectoral knowledge from collective management bodies into assessments.
When it comes to complex, multifaceted and multidisciplinary, sectors and realities as agriculture, water and soil governance in rural areas, rural landscape and heritage, the integration of socio-economic information and the scientific and practical knowledge held by sectoral associations and collective management bodies (i.e. agricultural water managers, producers organisation, etc) should improve both the quality of environmental assessments and stakeholders confidence in the data used to support policy decisions.
- Ensure a balanced composition of consultant groups to mitigate the prevalence of environmental and climate experts.
A balanced composition of consultant groups would mitigate the prevalence of environmental and climate experts, allowing to provide policymakers with better suggestions.
- Improve dataset auditing, completeness, relevance, and access with error-reporting feedback mechanisms.
-
- Strengthen the social dimension and integrate social indicators into environmental information and monitoring.
The MSA recommends strengthening the social dimension of environmental information and monitoring.
- Give particular attention to small island states, peripheral regions, and coastal communities.
Particular attention should be given to small island states, peripheral regions and coastal communities, where environmental, economic and social pressures are often closely interconnected.
- Support the mainstreaming of Social Impact Assessment alongside environmental and economic assessments in EU policymaking.
The MSA also recommends that EEA evidence increasingly support the mainstreaming of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) alongside environmental and economic assessment in EU policymaking.
- Strengthen the social dimension and integrate social indicators into environmental information and monitoring.
-
- Consider and encourage the adoption of AI-automated Life Cycle Assessment solutions.
Consider and encourage the emergence of AI-automated LCA solutions.
- Prepare Eionet's infrastructure to interface directly with APIs of private market eco-design and compliance software.
Prepare Eionet's infrastructure to interface with the APIs of private market eco-design and compliance software.
- Consider and encourage the adoption of AI-automated Life Cycle Assessment solutions.
-
- Ensure that the EEA and EIONET are provided with all necessary capacity and resources.
Given their crucial role, it is important to ensure that the EEA and EIONET have all the needed capacity and resources to function properly.
- Ensure that the EEA and EIONET are provided with all necessary capacity and resources.
-
- Mechanisms should be established to transfer structured, verifiable ground-level observations from territories into EIONET and the EEA.
Terragora therefore recommends strengthening the mechanisms for the structured transfer of information from the territories to EIONET and the EEA, while ensuring its quality, traceability and comparability.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - EEA data and outputs should be made more accessible and practical for local stakeholders and small entities.
Place-based summaries, accessible visualisation tools and easy-to-use data would further transform European environmental knowledge into a real tool to support local decision-making.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Transparency regarding methods, sources, and uncertainties should be ensured to build trust in environmental policies.
Finally, Terragora considers that transparency of methods, sources and uncertainties is essential for trust in environmental sustainability.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
- Mechanisms should be established to transfer structured, verifiable ground-level observations from territories into EIONET and the EEA.
-
- Administrative burden should be reduced by simplifying reporting processes and enhancing data platform interoperability.
Further simplification of reporting processes, improved interoperability between Reportnet and other reporting platforms, and greater reuse of existing datasets could reduce administrative burden.
- The EEA should maintain a strong role supported by additional investments in digitalization and capacity building.
Additional investments in EEA/Eionet cooperation, digitalisation of reporting processes and support for national capacities could further strengthen effectiveness, efficiency and long-term sustainability.
- Administrative burden should be reduced by simplifying reporting processes and enhancing data platform interoperability.
-
Agencia Estatal CSIC Academic or research institution, ESP; register: Think tanks and research institutions model reads as: wants changes source
- The scientific basis of EEA activities should be strengthened via deeper collaboration with universities and research institutes.
The Agency should strengthen collaboration with research organisations and universities, ensuring that the latest scientific knowledge is systematically incorporated into environmental assessments, indicators and policy support tools.
- Environmental monitoring systems should be enhanced through innovative technologies such as Earth observation and data analytics.
Greater use of innovative technologies, including Earth observation, digital tools, advanced data analytics and interoperable databases, would enhance the timeliness, accessibility and comparability of environmental information across Member States.
- Diverse stakeholders should be more systematically integrated into environmental assessments and knowledge production.
Researchers, public authorities, businesses, civil society organisations and regional actors should be more systematically involved in knowledge production and environmental assessment processes.
- The scientific basis of EEA activities should be strengthened via deeper collaboration with universities and research institutes.
-
Rethink Plastic Alliance NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: wants changes source
- The EEA should independently evaluate whether European Green Deal legislation is delivering environmental outcomes during implementation.
The EEA should play a strong role in independently assessing whether major environmental legislation adopted as part of the European Green Deal is delivering its intended environmental outcomes as it moves through implementation, including the impact of subsequent omnibus and simplification packages on those outcomes.
- The evaluation should check whether EEA analytical capacity matches its growing set of responsibilities.
The evaluation should therefore assess whether sufficient capacity exists to undertake these new functions and independently assess the environmental outcomes of EU legislation as it moves through implementation.
- The evaluation should recognize the EEA's role in zero pollution monitoring and the contribution of citizen science.
Finally, the evaluation should recognise the EEAs key role in monitoring progress towards the Zero Pollution Action Plan targets and in providing robust evidence to inform policy development and implementation.
- The EEA should independently evaluate whether European Green Deal legislation is delivering environmental outcomes during implementation.
-
- A framework should be established to facilitate and strengthen the participation of non-EU countries in Eionet.
Strengthen non-EU participation: create a framework for Eionet activities that does not solely revolve around EU legislation, facilitate core dataflow collection for countries not bound by the Environmental Acquis, continue to clearly distinguish data collection and scientific assessment (open to all members) from regulatory alignment (specific to EU and European Economic Area states), and further strengthen mechanisms for non-EU partner engagement;
- Investments in digital infrastructure should be made to enhance real-time exchange, open data access, and reporting harmonization.
Invest in Eionet's digital infrastructure to improve real-time data exchange, open-data accessibility and standardised formats, in line with Switzerland's Open Government Data policy (in force since 2015), while reducing duplication between EEA, OECD, UNFCCC and UNECE reporting obligations and strengthening the complementary "Environment for Europe" (UNECE) process;
- Transparency should be ensured in how the EEA budget is allocated across its core functions.
Ensure transparency in EEA budget allocation across its core functions, so that Switzerland's financial contribution under Article 2 of the bilateral Environmental Agreement remains commensurate with its full membership rights and participation capacities.
- A framework should be established to facilitate and strengthen the participation of non-EU countries in Eionet.
-
- The scientific boards of UNEP and EEA should evaluate the project for recovering separated water from reverse osmosis systems.
If you review my scientific project on the recovery of separated water in Türkiye and evaluate it within the scientific boards of both the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the European Environment Agency (EEA), we can restore at least half a billion tons of freshwater annually for human use in the name of environmental sustainability.
- The EEA should pioneer and enable the immediate implementation of separated water recovery.
I sincerely hope that you will pioneer this endeavor, which holds the potential to rank among major environmental initiatives for humanity, and enable its implementation without delay.
- The scientific boards of UNEP and EEA should evaluate the project for recovering separated water from reverse osmosis systems.
-
- Improve the interoperability and integration of data systems and streamline reporting requirements to minimise duplication.
In this regard, there is scope to further improve the interoperability and integration of national and EU-level environmental data systems, as well as to streamline reporting requirements and minimise duplication.
- Expand automated and reusable data flows supported by common standards to reduce administrative burden.
Greater use of automated and interoperable data flows could help reduce the administrative burden associated with environmental reporting, while at the same time improving the timeliness, consistency and accessibility of environmental information.
- Simplify the explanations of QA check blockers, errors, and warnings for air quality reporting.
Simplifying these explanations where possible would facilitate the reporting process for the users.
- Improve the interoperability and integration of data systems and streamline reporting requirements to minimise duplication.
-
RIVM - National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Public authority, NLD model reads as: supports source
- Communication channels should be improved beyond Microsoft Teams to broaden participant engagement.
One improvement would be the way of communication, since many participants are not familiar with Microsoft Teams.
- Communication channels should be improved beyond Microsoft Teams to broaden participant engagement.
-
- Data, indicators, and analyses produced by the EEA and Eionet must adequately reflect the specific environmental realities of regional territories.
O documento sublinha a importância de assegurar que os dados, indicadores e análises desenvolvidos reflitam adequadamente as especificidades e os desafios ambientais destes territórios, nomeadamente no domínio da biodiversidade, dos ecossistemas marinhos e da adaptação às alterações climáticas.
- Data, indicators, and analyses produced by the EEA and Eionet must adequately reflect the specific environmental realities of regional territories.
Who met the cabinets on the subject
60 meetings by subject similarity, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Jul 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | American Chamber of Commerce in France (Trade unions and professional associations) | Introduction / overview EU environmental policies |
| 22 Jul 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | European Passenger Transport Operators (Trade and business associations); CAISSE DES DEPOTS (Other organisations, public or mixed entities); Veolia Environnement (Companies & groups); ENEDIS (Companies & groups); Bpifrance (Other organisations, public or mixed entities); Athenora Consulting (Professional consultancies); Orano (Companies & groups); Orange (Companies & groups); TotalEnergies SE (Companies & groups); Transdev Group (Companies & groups); RAZEL-BEC (Companies & groups); UFE - Union of Finance Personnel in Europe (Trade unions and professional associations); SUEZ Group (Companies & groups) | EU environmental policies |
| 27 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Stichting BirdLife Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); European Environmental Bureau (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Implementation and enforcement of EU environmental legislation |
| 26 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Raffaele Fitto | European Express Association (Trade and business associations) | Presentation of EEA members activities and issues faced in relation to EU regulation |
| 20 Oct 2025 | Commissioner Marta Kos | CEE Bankwatch Network (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Transport and Environment (European Federation for Transport and Environment) (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Umweltorganisation WWF Central and Eastern Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Eurogroup for Animals (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Implementation of EU acquis across several areas, including environment, climate, labour and animal welfare. |
| 19 Nov 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Boliden Group (Companies & groups) | EU environmental legislation |
| 10 Nov 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | EssilorLuxottica (Companies & groups); Meta Platforms Ireland Limited and its various subsidiaries (Companies & groups) | EU environmental legislation |
| 26 May 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | BUSINESSEUROPE (Trade and business associations) | Review of the EU ETS Directive |
| 27 May 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund (Trade and business associations) | EU environmental policy and agriculture |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Teneo Brussels (Professional consultancies) | Environmental omnibus, EUDR |
| 16 Jan 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | European Council on Foreign Relations (Think tanks and research institutions) | EU's environmental agenda for the coming years |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | NG Nordic AS (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on the review of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and the upcoming Circular Economy Act (CEA) |
| 16 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | European State Forest Association (Other organisations, public or mixed entities) | EUSTAFOR positions towards EU policies and instruments, in particular the upcoming revision of the EU Bioeconomy Strategy |
| 23 Jun 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | eBay EU liaison office (Companies & groups) | Simplification of environmental compliance obligations, Environmental Omnibus, Circular Economy Act and European Product Act. |
| 23 Jun 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | EuropeanIssuers (Trade and business associations) | Draft Delegated Acts revising the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) |
| 27 May 2025 | Commissioner Christophe Hansen | Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund (Trade and business associations) | Common Agricultural Policy, EU environmental policy |
| 17 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | European Commission Priorities |
| 22 Jun 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Insurance Europe (Trade and business associations) | European Sustainability reporting standards |
| 8 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque | COMPAGNIE NATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES AUX COMPTES (Trade unions and professional associations) | Discussing (i) insights on the French implementation of EU sustainability regulations; and (ii) ongoing developments related to audited industries |
| 1 Jun 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget (Companies & groups) | EU environmental policies and forestry. |
| 13 Apr 2026 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | Centre for Democracy & Technology, Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | EU policies and regulatory enforcement in the digital and AI areas |
| 15 Mar 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Läkemedelsindustriföreningen (Trade and business associations) | Impact of EU environmental policies on the life science sector |
| 15 Mar 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Novartis International AG (Companies & groups) | Impact of EU environmental policies on the life science sector |
| 19 Mar 2026 | Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu | Foundation for European Progressive Studies (Other organisations, public or mixed entities) | EU Initiatives |
| 23 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Christophe Hansen | DSM-Firmenich (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on agricultural challenges, EU emission reduction measures, and feed additives |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Commissioner Ekaterina Zaharieva | Baker Hughes Holdings (Companies & groups) | • EU R&I related to clean tech • Portfolio-related simplification agenda • Choose Europe initiative |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Siemens AG (Companies & groups); Alstom (Companies & groups); Schneider Electric (Companies & groups); Manufacture Française des Pneumatiques Michelin (Companies & groups); Orange (Companies & groups) | European Sustainability Reporting Standards |
| 20 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | DIGITALEUROPE (Trade and business associations) | European Sustainability Reporting Standards |
| 19 Mar 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Cattaneo Zanetto Pomposo & Co. (Professional consultancies) | European Sustainability Reporting Standards |
| 2 Mar 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | WWF European Policy Programme (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Frank Bold Society (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | European Sustainability Reporting Standards |
Showing 30 of 60.