Independent demo, not an official EU site. AI summaries can be wrong; data from 5 Oct 2026. Disclaimer

DIGITALEUROPE

Business association, Brussels, Belgium. EU Transparency Register entry

4 open consultations fit DIGITALEUROPE.

Check each match yourself. In a blind test about half of the suggestions were a real fit (15 of 30). How it was measured

Open a consultation below to see what it is about, who has already answered and the key passages. Data from 5 Oct 2026.

Open consultations for DIGITALEUROPE

Cloud and AI Development Act until 11 Nov 2026 good fit Strengthening Europe's cloud and AI ecosystem directly targets DIGITALEUROPE's core mission representing the digital technology industry.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission proposes the Cloud and AI Development Act to establish a framework of measures aimed at strengthening Europe's cloud and artificial intelligence ecosystem. The initiative focuses on three pillars, which include research and innovation for greening infrastructure, industrial investments to triple EU data processing capacity, and actions to increase secure data processing capacities for cloud providers in the EU. Ultimately, the proposal seeks to address infrastructure gaps, reduce critical dependencies on non-European providers, and enhance the Union's digital sovereignty and competitiveness.

  • Addresses the EU gap in cloud and AI infrastructure capacity through three distinct pillars.
  • Promotes research and innovation to accelerate sustainable cloud and AI computing technologies.
  • Aims to triple the EU data processing capacity over the next 5 to 7 years via industrial investments.
  • Introduces measures to increase secure data processing capacities for high-critical use cases.
  • Establishes common criteria for sovereign cloud computing services to reduce extraterritorial dependencies.
  • Promotes open-source solutions and joint public procurement activities across the public sector.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. They position Europe not just as a consumer of advanced digital technologies but as a global hub for trusted, sovereign and scalable digital infrastructure capable of shaping the standards, capabilities and markets of the next technological wave. • Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The proposal is consistent with the rules on switching between data processing services introduced by the Data Act. By enabling switching and removing key sources of vendor lock- in, the Data Act seeks to ensure that cloud computing service providers in the EU compete on quality, innovation, and price. It seeks to enable cloud users to freely choose the provider that best meets their needs and combine offers of different providers in a multi-cloud approach.
    Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 4 (EN)
  2. The national cloud and AI strategies should also be aligned with the associated digital targets set under Decision (EU) 2022/2481 (23), in particular on the adoption of cloud computing services, big data and AI by at least 75% of Union enterprises for their business operations, and the deployment of at least 10 000 climate-neutral highly secure edge nodes in the Union, 23 Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (OJ L 323, 19.12.2022, p. 4, ELI http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2022/2481/oj).
    Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 23 (EN)
  3. In its conclusions on the future of EU digital policy of 21 May 2024 (32), the Council of the European Union confirmed the relevance and importance of achieving this common approach by inviting the Commission to continue its support for the development of interoperable public digital services and the cross-border interconnection of public administrations’ infrastructure, including cloud and edge infrastructures, to increase their resilience, efficiency and sustainability. To achieve this common approach, it is necessary to establish the European public-sector cloud federation (‘the EuroCloud Federation’). The EuroCloud Federation should bring together national and European cloud initiatives that provide highly trusted and secure public-sector cloud capabilities and facilitate the sharing of such capabilities between Union entities and public-sector bodies.
    Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 33 (EN)

Who has already answered

118 submissions in the snapshot (41 from organisations), portal total 118. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen70Business association14Company11NGO9Non-EU citizen7Academic or research institution3Public authority2Other2
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryESP33DEU16ITA6BEL6FRA6USA5AUT5GBR4DNK3IRL3

41 of 41 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 1 supports 2 wants changes 29 9 held back for review (low confidence).

  • Europeans for Safe Connections NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: opposes source
    • Add a new point to Annex I regarding health impacts and independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts in accordance with the precautionary principle.
      Should the legislative process nevertheless continue, we recommend adding a new point to Annex I: 9. Grand Challenge 9: Health Impacts Development of independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts, including cumulative impacts and long-term monitoring, in accordance with the precautionary principle.
  • Transparent Edge Services S.L. Company, ESP; register: Professional consultancies model reads as: wants changes source
    • Explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within the sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
      To ensure a comprehensive approach, CADA should explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within its sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
    • Incorporate a real 'evaluate once, use many times' principle by accepting existing national schemes and certifications as evidence of equivalent controls.
      To achieve this, Articles 17 and 20 and Annexes II and III would need to incorporate a real 'evaluate once, use many times' principle.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
    • Extend criteria regarding Union added value to any relevant procurement of cloud, edge and AI services and give them a significant minimum weighting.
      In order for them to contribute effectively to reducing strategic dependencies, they should be extended to any relevant procurement of cloud, edge and AI services and be given a significant minimum weighting, adapted to the sensitivity and subject matter of the contract.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
  • Kaspersky Labs Limited Company, DEU; register: Companies & groups model reads as: supports source
    • Expand sustainable computational capacity.
      we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
    • Strengthen Europe's competitiveness in artificial intelligence.
      we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
    • Improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
      we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.

29 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups43Trade and business associations10Non-governmental organisations, platf.5Professional consultancies3not in register export2Academic institutions2Other organisations, public or mixed.1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
13 Jul 2026 President Ursula von der Leyen Domyn SpA (Companies & groups) Development of AI infrastructure, cloud services and AI applications in the EU
16 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen UpCloud Oy (Companies & groups) EU Cloud policy
3 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) EU Cloud policy
11 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen The Open Cloud Coalition (Trade and business associations) EU Cloud Policy
26 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Equinix (EMEA) Holdings B.V. (Companies & groups) EU Cloud Policy
22 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen European Sovereign Tech Industry Alliance (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) EU Cloud Policy
22 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) European Cloud Policies
13 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen QTS Data Centers (Companies & groups) European Cloud Policy
14 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) European cloud policies
20 Nov 2025 President Ursula von der Leyen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) To discuss European Cloud and Data Strategy
11 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen France Digitale (Trade and business associations) EU agenda on AI and tech sovereignty
10 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen ASML Netherlands B.V. (Companies & groups) EU agenda on AI and tech sovereignty

Showing 12 of 60.

Child Safety Online until 26 Nov 2026 good fit Regulations on child safety online directly impose design and compliance obligations on member digital platforms and online services.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission proposes the EU Kids Act regulation to establish a uniform digital environment for children across the European Union. The proposal introduces harmonized age limits, restricting autonomous account creation on social media and video sharing platforms for children under 15, with parental involvement allowed for older minors. It also sets out security-by-design requirements for online services, video sharing platforms, online games, AI companions, and app stores. Furthermore, the regulation establishes proportionate, privacy-compliant age-verification frameworks and harmonized enforcement mechanisms to prevent market fragmentation.

  • Establishes a single EU-wide digital age limit and restricts autonomous account creation on social media and video sharing platforms for children under 15.
  • Sets out security-by-design requirements for social media, video platforms, online games, AI companions, and app stores.
  • Introduces proportional and privacy-respecting age-verification criteria and safeguards.
  • Defines a structured enforcement framework relying on existing structures with expedited procedures.
  • Builds on existing EU rules such as the Digital Services Act and the Artificial Intelligence Act to prevent regulatory fragmentation in the single market.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

The Commission document is in FR; open to read the 3 passages in that language.
  1. FR 42 FR la fiabilité, la robustesse, la non-intrusion, la protection de la vie privée et la non- discrimination. (63) Reconnaissant qu’une protection efficace des mineurs nécessite non seulement des mesures réglementaires, mais aussi des actions de sensibilisation, d’éducation et d’autonomisation, les États membres devraient mettre en place des stratégies nationales en s’appuyant sur la communication de la Commission au Parlement européen, au Conseil, au Comité économique et social européen et au Comité des régions du 11 mai 2022 intitulée «Une décennie numérique pour les enfants et les jeunes:
    Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL..., page 43 (FR)
  2. LE PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROPÉENNE, vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne, et notamment son article 114, vu la proposition de la Commission européenne, après transmission du projet d’acte législatif aux parlements nationaux, vu l’avis du Comité économique et social européen1, vu l'avis du Comité des régions2, statuant conformément à la procédure législative ordinaire, considérant ce qui suit: (1) Les services de réseaux sociaux en ligne, les services de plateformes de partage de vidéos, les compagnons d’intelligence artificielle (IA), les agents conversationnels généralistes, les jeux en ligne et les boutiques d’applications logicielles sont devenus un élément important de la vie quotidienne des mineurs.
    Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL..., page 18 (FR)
  3. • Comme indiqué ci-dessus, la Commission a déjà établi, aux fins des exigences E1 et E2, un schéma directeur UE de vérification de l’âge, qui doit maintenant être adopté par les États membres ou les entreprises privées. Elle a déjà entrepris de définir le programme UE de vérification de l'âge et de dresser les deux listes visées par l’exigence E3. • Le partage d’informations entre autorités responsables reposera sur le système AGORA, qui est un système de partage sécurisé destiné à faciliter les communications entre les coordinateurs pour les services numériques dans les États membres, la Commission et le comité européen des services numériques (lui-même composé des coordinateurs pour les services numériques).
    Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL..., page 110 (FR)

Who has already answered

1,507 submissions in the snapshot (15 from organisations), portal total 1,507. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen1,344Non-EU citizen148Other5NGO4Company3Academic or research institution2Business association1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryDEU225NLD120FIN103SWE102POL93FRA78GBR74ITA71BEL63ROU60

15 of 15 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 6 wants changes 7 2 held back for review (low confidence).

  • AI & Partners Company, NLD model reads as: wants changes source
    • Explicitly state children's rights under Article 24 of the Charter and UNCRC General Comment No. 25 in the text.
      Children's rights under Article 24 of the Charter and UNCRC General Comment No. 25 should be stated explicitly in the text.
    • Prohibit simulated intimacy and require crisis protocols for harmful content.
      Prohibit AI that: claims to be human; engages in romantic or sexual role-play; guilt-trips children or discourages human relationships; asks children to keep secrets.
    • Ban training models on children's conversations, emotional profiling, and in-chat advertising.
      Ban training models on children's conversations, emotional profiling and in-chat advertising.
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) NGO, USA model reads as: opposes source
    • Remove mandatory age gates for social media and video-sharing platforms that lead to privacy-intrusive age verification.
      1. mandatory age gates for social media and video-sharing platform, leading to privacy-intrusive age verification;
    • Reconsider safety by design measures that raise concerns about product-safety doctrines in speech regulation and federated services.
      2. certain safety by design measures, raising concerns about product-safety doctrines in speech regulation and their application to federated services; and
    • Address regulatory overlap with the EU's Digital Fairness Act agenda to avoid undermining consumer law.
      3. regulatory overlap with the EU's Digital Fairness Act agenda, risking undermining useful additions to the consumer law acquis.
  • Faculty of Laws, University College London Academic or research institution, GBR model reads as: wants changes source
    • Address significant drafting errors and scope challenges arising from the reuse of Digital Markets Act definitions.
      Reuse of DMA definitions, which are designed for designation within, creates significant scope challenges.
    • Refine the overly broad risk criteria for Article 6 to avoid unintentionally capturing non-risky services.
      Risk criteria for Art 6 so broad to capture non-risky services, just because they are designed to incentivise interaction (as so many services are).
    • Clarify parental responsibility provisions to better account for complex family situations and domestic abuse risks.
      Parental responsibility is not held as digital data (e.g. court orders) for complex families, domestic abuse, etc.

10 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups37Trade and business associations12Non-governmental organisations, platf.5Other organisations, public or mixed.2not in register export2Professional consultancies2Think tanks and research institutions1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
22 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Highgate Advisory Ltd (Professional consultancies) Online child protection and societal impact of technology
22 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Highgate Advisory Ltd (Professional consultancies) Online child protection and societal impact of technology
8 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Common Sense Media Protection of children online
21 Jan 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath OpenAI OpCo, LLC (Companies & groups) Discussion on the Digital Fairness Act, youth protection online and regulatory simplification
16 Jun 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Supercell Oy Digital Fairness Act, Online protection of minors
25 Feb 2026 Commissioner Magnus Brunner Eurochild AISBL (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Children’s rights in the digital environment
5 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Eurochild AISBL (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Policies for children in the digital space
4 May 2026 President Ursula von der Leyen OpenAI OpCo, LLC (Companies & groups) Child safety online and competitiveness
13 Apr 2026 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez Centre for Democracy & Technology, Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) EU policies and regulatory enforcement in the digital and AI areas
28 May 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Netflix International B.V. (Companies & groups) Digital Fairness Act, recommender systems, protection of minors
3 Jun 2026 President Ursula von der Leyen Apple Inc. (Companies & groups) Protection of minors online
8 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Snap, Inc. (Companies & groups) Protection of minors online

Showing 12 of 60.

Minimum performance standards for data centres in Europe until 14 Dec 2026 good fit Performance standards for data centres regulate critical digital infrastructure operated and built by its member industries.

Same initiative, also open: 26059

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission is preparing an initiative to establish common Union minimum performance standards for data centres located in its territory. Building on existing reporting and rating schemes under the Energy Efficiency Directive, the proposed regulation aims to phase out unsustainable practices and technologies in new or retrofitted facilities. The initiative seeks to address rising energy and water consumption, limited waste heat reuse, and regulatory fragmentation across Member States. An impact assessment is planned for late 2026, with a legislative proposal anticipated in the second quarter of 2027.

  • Establish common EU minimum performance standards for data centres regarding energy efficiency, water use, waste-heat reuse, and grid services.
  • Form the third step in the EU sustainability framework for data centres, following the 2024 reporting scheme and the 2026 rating scheme.
  • Prevent divergent national approaches and reduce regulatory fragmentation across Member States.
  • Improve sector competitiveness and reduce operational costs by cutting energy and water waste.
  • Support energy system integration by aligning data centre operations with power grid and heat network needs.
  • Prepare an impact assessment in Q4 2026 to support the drafting of the legislative proposal for Q2 2027.

What is asked: The consultation aims to collect in-depth evidence, information, data and feedback from stakeholders on the need for and feasibility of minimum performance standards for data centres in the EU, the most appropriate way to establish them, which indicators should have standards, and what thresholds should be set.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. This sector touches upon two important EU objectives, namely the Union’s technological sovereignty and the Union’s energy resilience and security. Expanding computing capacities and increasing the number of data centres on the Union’s territory is essential, but it also poses challenges, not only in terms of increasing energy consumption but also for electricity grids, carbon emissions and environmental resources such as water. In response, the EU’s digital strategy emphasises the need for highly energy-efficient and sustainable data centres. As highlighted by the Draghi report on EU competitiveness, using energy more efficiently makes it possible to cut costs, which is vital for the competitiveness of European industries. The Energy Efficiency Directive (EU) 2023/1791 (EED) requires to promote energy efficiency and sustainability in data centres.
    Establishment of common Union minimum performance standards for..., page 1 (EN)
  2. Problem the initiative aims to tackle As highlighted by the Draghi report and the AI Continent Action Plan, expanding data centre capacity in the EU is essential for fostering AI innovation, accelerating digitalisation, boosting EU competitiveness across industries and supporting a mature data economy. To ensure this, several sustainability challenges need to be tackled: 1. rising energy and water consumption 2. limited waste heat reuse and energy system integration 3. the lack of a framework guiding data centres’ sustainability efforts 4. the lack of regulatory convergence between countries 5. competitiveness and affordability concerns 6. barriers to innovation and uptake of clean technologies Basis for EU action (legal basis and subsidiarity check) Legal basis The legal basis for this initiative is Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
    Establishment of common Union minimum performance standards for..., page 1 (EN)
  3. rating scheme and label to promote best practices (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/7000) 3. minimum performance standards phasing out the worst technologies and practices The proposed standards will be reviewed regularly. This will ensure that they follow technological developments and the state of the art for the design and building of new data centres. C. Likely impacts Setting minimum performance standards for data centres in the EU should bring multiple benefits, including: • reducing the energy consumption and environmental footprint of data centres in the EU by ensuring that all new or retrofitted data centres meet essential benchmarks for energy efficiency, water usage and other selected sustainability criteria. • improving the sector’s competitiveness by making better use of energy and water, thus reducing operational costs.
    Establishment of common Union minimum performance standards for..., page 2 (EN)

Who has already answered

23 submissions in the snapshot (5 from organisations), portal total 23. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen16NGO2Non-EU citizen2Other2Business association1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryITA6ROU4NLD2DNK1EST1FIN1FRA1CHE1IRL1JPN1

5 of 5 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 2 3 held back for review (low confidence).

  • Hydrogen Ireland Association Business association, IRL; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Recognise the role of hydrogen in providing zero-carbon backup and long-duration resilience.
      1. Recognise hydrogens role in providing zerocarbon backup and longduration resilience
    • Support onsite electrolysis and clean generation as part of data centre design.
      2. Support onsite electrolysis and clean generation as part of datacentre design
    • Reward flexibility services that reduce system costs and integrate more renewables.
      3. Reward flexibility services that reduce system costs and integrate more renewables
  • DigitalTrade4.EU Other, EST; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: wants changes source
    • Ensure binding thresholds are based on robust evidence rather than applied mechanically to an immature dataset.
      binding thresholds should be based on robust, comparable and enforcement-ready evidence rather than applied mechanically to an immature dataset.
    • Calibrate each KPI separately and keep measurement rules and methodology versions explicit.
      recommend that the Commission calibrate each KPI separately, keep measurement rules and methodology versions explicit
    • Avoid rules that unintentionally penalise AI, HPC, liquid cooling, necessary redundancy or economically proportionate retrofits.
      avoid rules that unintentionally penalise AI/HPC, liquid cooling, necessary redundancy or economically proportionate retrofits.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups33Trade and business associations15Other organisations, public or mixed.5Think tanks and research institutions4Non-governmental organisations, platf.4Professional consultancies3not in register export2
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
11 Jun 2026 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Data4 (Companies & groups) Data centers in Europe
9 Apr 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Everpure, Inc. (Companies & groups) Discussion on the energy efficiency potential for data centers
9 Apr 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Madoqua Renewables Holding (Companies & groups) Discussion on the energy efficiency potential for data centers
3 Apr 2025 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners P/S (Companies & groups) How Europe can build up the capacity of energy instruments capacity
17 Feb 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) European Commission Priorities
8 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) Feuille de route de la Commission européenne en matière de compétitivité et de souveraineté ; réforme des marchés publics ; Cyber resilience act ; localisation des data centers.
8 May 2026 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Grundfos A/S (Companies & groups) Energy efficiency and data centres
9 Apr 2025 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Everpure, Inc. (Companies & groups) Energy efficiency, data centres
1 Oct 2025 Commissioner Ekaterina Zaharieva Commissariat à l'Energie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (Think tanks and research institutions) • EU R&I policies and recent initiatives related to energy • European Strategy on research and technology infrastructures • Commission’s proposal for the Euratom Research and Training Programme 2028-2034 • Developments in innovat
27 May 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Fortum Oyj (Companies & groups) Commission’s draft Delegated Regulation establishing a common Union rating scheme for datacenters
21 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Suomen itsenäisyyden juhlarahasto (Other organisations, public or mixed entities) EU data union
7 Jul 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Data4 (Companies & groups) General exchange on data centre infrastructure and its role in European digital and industrial competitiveness.

Showing 12 of 60.

Revision of EU rules on public procurement until 30 Nov 2026 good fit Public procurement rules directly affect tech vendor contracts and preferences for digital infrastructure in Europe.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission proposes a revision of EU public procurement rules through a new regulation that repeals the existing 2014 directives on public procurement, utilities, and concessions. The initiative aims to modernize and simplify rules, reduce administrative burdens, and enable preferences for European products in strategic sectors to secure supply chains and add EU value. It also amends multiple sector-specific regulations and directives containing procurement provisions to improve coherence and transparency. Furthermore, the proposal addresses high administrative burdens and legal uncertainty identified in previous evaluations regarding public buyers and businesses.

  • Revises and replaces Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU, and 2014/25/EU with a single Public Procurement Act regulation.
  • Enables preference for European products in strategic sectors to ensure security of supply and EU added value.
  • Aims to modernize and simplify rules, specifically considering EU start-ups and innovators.
  • Amends various sector-specific regulations and directives that contain public procurement provisions.
  • Addresses administrative burdens and legal uncertainty that currently affect public buyers and businesses, including SMEs.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. Overall, the comments highlighted the complexity and diversity of views on the potential impacts of a digital public procurement marketplace, and the need for a careful and nuanced approach to its design and implementation. All other respondents A digital public procurement marketplace is expected to have several impacts, including the provision of tools for monitoring and enforcing labour standards and other obligations, such as cross-referencing of data. Many respondents emphasize the importance of excluding operators that do not respect their obligations, including those that engage in tax evasion or avoidance, and creating an EU list of excluded actors. Additionally, digitalisation is expected to improve transparency, reduce administrative burdens, and increase access to procurement opportunities for SMEs and cross-border transactions.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 311 (EN)
  2. For example, one respondent stated that "A single centralised system at EU level would further discourage economic operators and make the system even more complex for everyone." Another respondent suggested that "A Portal Guide would increase transparency and ensure consistency of data, making it easier for economic operators and contracting authorities to work." Overall, the comments highlighted the need for a balanced approach that takes into account the diverse needs and interests of different stakeholders. EU companies and business associations EU companies and business associations expressed a range of views on the potential impacts of a digital public procurement marketplace. Some emphasized the potential benefits of improved digitalization, including increased transparency, reduced administrative burdens, and enhanced access to procurement opportunities.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 310 (EN)
  3. 431 • PwC(2026), Assessment of policy options on digital procurement, Analysis of costs and benefits, Publications Office of the European Union, 2026, (publication pending). • SILO (2026), SME Participation in EU Public Procurement: Evidence from TED (2018-2023), Publications Office of the European Union, 2026, (publication pending). • Titl, V., & Schotanus, F. (2025), Onderzoek naar een nationale dataspace voor overheidsopdrachten, Utrecht University, February 2025 (https://research- portal.uu.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-een-nationale-dataspace-voor- overheidsopdrachten). • Wainikka, Ch. (2026), Intellectual Property in Public Procurement, Country comparisons and impact on companies, Publications Office of the European Union, 2026 (forthcoming). • World Bank (2025), European Union:
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 432 (EN)

Who has already answered

14 submissions in the snapshot (11 from organisations), portal total 14. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeCompany5Other5Non-EU citizen2EU citizen1Public authority1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryTUR3CHE1CHN1DEU1EST1FIN1AUT1ITA1NLD1PAK1

11 of 11 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 10

  • Landesregierung Public authority, AUT model reads as: wants changes source
    • Maintain the legal form of directives instead of a regulation.
      However, we are in favour of maintaining the legal form of the directives harmonising procurement law.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Delete the obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan.
      The obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan is rejected.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Ensure contracting entities have the freedom to choose between lowest price and quality criteria.
      contracting entities should be given the freedom to choose between awarding the contract to the tender offering the lowest price or evaluating tenders on the basis of quality criteria.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
  • Micro company, ITA Other, ITA model reads as: supports source
    • Maintain the inclusion of Geographical Indications in the list of considerations for food procurement in Article 53.
      Geographical Indications are included in this list of considerations.
  • Micro company, DEU Other, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
    • Include an explicit opening clause in the new regulation that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality.
      We therefore call for the new EU Public Procurement Regulation to include an explicit opening clause that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality, provided that the following minimum requirements are met: Independence of the audit body from the certified organisation Defined and documented audit scope Regular recertification at specified intervals Public verifiability of the certificate status.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Explicitly safeguard and perpetuate the practice of accepting quality management systems as proof of suitability through a clear opening clause.
      The new regulation should explicitly safeguard and perpetuate this practice through a clear opening clause.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE

8 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations25Companies & groups19Non-governmental organisations, platf.9Trade unions and professional associa.5Professional consultancies3Other organisations, public or mixed.2not in register export1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
18 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné SGI Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Revision of European public procurement rules
22 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Disability Forum (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) European Single Market, Standardisation, Public Procurement, Intellectual Property
23 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné France Digitale (Trade and business associations) Public procurement, Common European Industrial Policy for Innovation and European Preference
10 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné CONSEIL EUROPÉEN DES CHAMBRES D'INGÉNIEURS (Other organisations, public or mixed entities); Architects' Council of Europe (Trade unions and professional associations); Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-Conseils (Luxembourg) (Trade unions and professional associations); European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations (Trade and business associations) Discussion on the upcoming revision of the public procurement Directives
5 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Zentralverband Deutsches Baugewerbe (Trade and business associations) EU procurement directives
13 Apr 2026 Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu Social Services Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) APS, European Pillar of Social Rights, and the revision of the Public Procurement Directive
26 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
4 Nov 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Federation of Public Service Unions (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
21 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
26 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Companies & groups) Discussion on EU public procurement rules including on plans regarding future European content requirements.
19 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Compagnie de SAINT-GOBAIN (Companies & groups); Lysios Public Affairs (Professional consultancies) Exchange of views on the revision of the Public Procurement Directives
8 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Koninklijke Philips (Companies & groups) Current economic situation (tariffs), EU regulation, Innovation, Single Market, Public Procurement, Sustainability, data Protection

Showing 12 of 60.