Egmont - Royal Institute for International Relations
Think tank, Brussels, Belgium. EU Transparency Register entry
2 open consultations fit Egmont, plus 3 possible fits.
Check each match yourself. In a blind test about half of the suggestions were a real fit (15 of 30). How it was measured
- Best fit: Review of the International Procurement Instrument until 1 Dec 2026
- Closing soonest: Proposal for a new Regulation on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) until 6 Nov 2026
Open a consultation below to see what it is about, who has already answered and the key passages. Data from 5 Oct 2026.
Open consultations for Egmont
Review of the International Procurement Instrument Assessing trade defense instruments against non-EU countries addresses international economic relations and geopolitical competition.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
Same initiative, also open: 25895
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission is conducting a review of the scope, functioning, and efficiency of Regulation (EU) 2022/1031 on the International Procurement Instrument (IPI). The review evaluates the implementation of the regulation, including investigation processes, consultations, thresholds, exceptions, and the first adopted IPI measure regarding medical devices from China. It aims to assess the instrument's effectiveness in tackling procurement barriers in non-EU countries and ensuring a level playing field for EU operators. The findings will be presented in a report to the European Parliament and the Council by August 2027.
- Review of the scope, functioning, and efficiency of the IPI Regulation pursuant to Article 14.
- Assessment of investigation procedures, third-country consultations, thresholds, and types of measures.
- Evaluation of the application and implementation of the first IPI measure concerning Chinese medical devices.
- Analysis of the efficiency of online complaint tools and rules for determining origin.
- Execution of a 12-week online public consultation through the Have your say portal.
- Publication of a factual summary of consultation results and an implementation report to the European Parliament and the Council.
What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide views and evidence on the implementation, scope, functioning, and efficiency of the IPI Regulation in tackling non-EU procurement barriers, achieving market openness, and ensuring a level playing field, as well as the application of specific measures adopted under the Regulation.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
4 We are consulting stakeholders to assess the implementation of the IPI Regulation in terms of: - the scope, functioning and efficiency of the Regulation in tackling non-EU countries procurement barriers, achieving openness of non-EU countries public procurement markets and ensuring a level playing field for EU businesses, goods, services and works; - implementation of specific measures adopted under the IPI Regulation. Target audience The target audience is composed of, in particular, interested parties affected by measures or practices in non-EU counties (e.g. businesses, business associations and cross-industry organisations), EU contracting authorities and EU contracting entities.
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the..., page 4 (EN)Future monitoring The Commission will continue monitoring the IPI Regulation. As set out in Article 14 of the Regulation, every five years after the first report, the Commission will review the scope, functioning and efficiency, presenting a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. C. Better regulation Consultation strategy This consultation aims to collect evidence and views from stakeholders on the IPI Regulation. The consultation strategy includes a 12-week online public consultation through a dedicated questionnaire available in the EU’s 24 official languages. The public consultation is accessible on the Commission’s Have your say portal and is launched alongside this call for evidence. Replies to the online public consultation can be submitted in any of the EU’s 24 official languages.
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the..., page 3 (EN)CALL FOR EVIDENCE FOR AN INITIATIVE This document aims to inform the public and stakeholders about the Commission’s work, so they can provide feedback and participate effectively in consultation activities. We ask these groups to provide views on the Commission’s understanding of the problem and possible solutions, and to give us any relevant information they may have. TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE International Procurement Instrument review LEAD DG - RESPONSIBLE UNIT Directorate-General for Trade & Economic Security - Unit B.3, Digital Trade, Intellectual Property and Public Procurement
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the..., page 1 (EN)
Who has already answered
6 submissions in the snapshot (1 from organisations), portal total 6. Feedback list on the portal.
1 of 1 organisation submission analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 1
-
Mona Solutions Company, GBR; register: Self-employed individuals model reads as: wants changes source
- Provide further worked examples on how origin is established and evidenced for complex economic-operator structures.
Further worked examples should show how origin is established and evidenced in these circumstances, including what constitutes proportionate evidence where substantive business operations are not self-evident.
- Make the applicability of an IPI measure clearly visible on TED alongside the relevant contract notice.
We support making the applicability of an IPI measure clearly visible on TED alongside the relevant contract notice.
- Provide further guidance on proportionate evidence, trigger points for verification, treatment of changes in subcontractors or supply chains, and record-keeping during contract performance.
Further guidance would be useful on proportionate evidence, trigger points for verification, treatment of changes in subcontractors or supply chains, and record-keeping.
- Provide further worked examples on how origin is established and evidenced for complex economic-operator structures.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Dec 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Orgalim - Europe's Technology Industries (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) and reform of Public Procurement Directives |
| 26 May 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | BUSINESSEUROPE (Trade and business associations) | Review of the EU ETS Directive |
| 10 Nov 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Infosys (Companies & groups) | Implementation of the EU’s AI Act |
| 13 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Confederation of Finnish Industries EK (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on current and upcoming instruments of EU industrial policy |
| 20 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Management Services Limited Liability Company & CO. KG (Companies & groups) | Presentation of GlobalFoundries activities in the EU. Exchange of views on the Commission’s work on Chips Act “2.0”. |
| 24 Mar 2026 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | OpenAI OpCo, LLC (Companies & groups) | OpenAI activities and EU regulation |
| 15 Oct 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | TotalEnergies Corbion B.V. | Exchange of views on the Industrial Accelerator Act and EU regulation linked to chemical activities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque | Optiver (Companies & groups) | Exchange with Optiver on Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 (IFR) |
| 18 May 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | TIC Council (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on the third-party conformity assessment and the revision of the New Legislative Framework as well as the Made in Europe initiative under the Industrial Accelerator Act. |
| 13 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra | eBay EU liaison office (Companies & groups) | Discussion on the implementation and functioning of Council Directive (EU) 2021/514 ‘DAC7’ |
| 24 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Hydnum Steel, S.L. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on the labelling and “Made in Europe” requirements under the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA). |
| 16 Dec 2024 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | FIGIEFA - Fédération Internationale des Grossistes, Importateurs & Exportateurs en Fournitures Automobiles / International Federation of Automotive Distributors (Trade and business associations); European Principal Traders Association (Trade and business associations); European Association Automotive Suppliers (Trade and business associations); European Garage Equipment Association (Trade and business associations); European Council for Motor Trades and Repairs (Trade and business associations); Register ID 6025320863-10; Leaseurope (Trade and business associations); Insurance Europe (Trade and business associations) | Exchange with the Independent Service Providers (ISPs) on the upcoming Commission Initiatives that will support the whole sector competitiveness, including the Competitiveness Compass, the Clean Industry Deal and the Automotive Industry Plan |
Showing 12 of 60.
Proposal for a new Regulation on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) Revising the mandate and capabilities of Europol aligns closely with the institute's research focus on European security policy and counterterrorism.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission has proposed a new regulation on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) to reinforce its operational role in combating serious cross-border crime and terrorism. The initiative replaces Regulation (EU) 2016/794, updates Europol's mandate to address a changing security landscape, and provides for increased resources and staff. It also establishes structured cooperation between Europol and eu-LISA for information management and ICT services while ensuring full alignment with EU data protection frameworks.
- Replaces Regulation (EU) 2016/794 to establish a revised mandate for Europol.
- Aims to enhance Europol's operational capabilities against online and offline serious crime and terrorism.
- Establishes structured cooperation between Europol and eu-LISA for information systems and communication infrastructure.
- Allocates an estimated EUR 1.053 billion and 910 additional staff posts over the 2028-2034 MFF.
- Maintains alignment with the EU data protection framework and fundamental rights standards.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
EN 155 EN robust prioritisation mechanisms and effective coordination between Europol, Member States, the Commission and other relevant Union bodies to avoid duplication of efforts and ensure coherent operational and technological development at Union level. In addition, experience from previous capability development and ICT modernisation projects demonstrated the need for clear allocation and traceability of Union resources across operational and technological support activities, combined with strong monitoring, reporting and accountability arrangements. The proposal therefore reinforces governance, planning and reporting mechanisms. Moreover, there are clear synergies that can be achieved in ICT projects through the cooperation between Europol and eu-LISA, the EU Agency for the Operational Management of Large- Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 156 (EN)(67) To provide specialised technical expertise and advice to support the development and implementation of Europol’s information systems and ICT infrastructure, an ICT and Information Management Advisory Group should be established to assist the Steering Group and Europol in designing, developing and operating information systems, communication infrastructure and information exchange mechanisms, and to promote common technical components, standards and best practices, while ensuring close coordination and cooperation between Europol, eu-LISA, Member States and the Commission on technical and implementation-related matters.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 41 (EN)EN 56 EN software, used by Europol for the prevention and combating of crimes falling within the scope of Europol’s competence (f) contribute to the implementation of the Schengen Evaluation and Monitoring Mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis under Council Regulation (EU) 2022/92262, Regulation (EU) 2022/922, within the scope of Europol’s competence, through the participation in Schengen evaluation missions and other on-site visits, provision of expertise and analyses, where requested by the Commission. (g) cooperate in a structured way and on a regular basis, including by concluding bilateral or multilateral working arrangements governing the modalities of such cooperation, with the anti-fraud actors involved in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, such as the EPPO, Eurojust, OLAF, AMLA and the EU Customs Authority. 3.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 57 (EN)
Who has already answered
3 submissions in the snapshot (1 from organisations), portal total 3. Feedback list on the portal.
1 of 1 organisation submission analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 1
-
- Add a new paragraph in article 7 to include an assessment of organised violence, intimidation and serious threats directed against law enforcement officers in strategic analytical products.
Add new paragraph in article 7 on Strategic analytical support : Europol shall include in its strategic analytical products an assessment of organised violence, intimidation and serious threats directed against law enforcement officers whenever such phenomena are linked to organised crime, terrorism or criminal activities with a hybrid dimension .
- Add a new paragraph in article 7 to maintain a permanent analytical capability concerning attacks against law enforcement officers.
Add new paragraph in article 7: Maintain a permanent analytical capability concerning attacks against law enforcement officers
- Amend article 13.3.e to include specific training on officer safety, operational resilience, violence directed against law enforcement officers and AI-assisted investigations.
Amend article 13.3.e Include training on officer safety, operational resilience, violence directed against law enforcement officers and AI-assisted investigations.
- Add a new paragraph in article 7 to include an assessment of organised violence, intimidation and serious threats directed against law enforcement officers in strategic analytical products.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Jun 2025 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | EUROGAS (Trade and business associations) | Implementation of EU legislation |
| 17 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | European Commission Priorities |
| 3 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Raffaele Fitto | UniCredit (Companies & groups) | General discussion on the priorities of the European Commission |
| 26 May 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | BUSINESSEUROPE (Trade and business associations) | Review of the EU ETS Directive |
| 27 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Stichting BirdLife Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); European Environmental Bureau (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Implementation and enforcement of EU environmental legislation |
| 14 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) | BDI-Proposal: European regulation establishing uniform European administrative procedural rules for permitting and notification procedures |
| 4 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Deutsche Telekom (Companies & groups) | Developments in European policies |
| 29 May 2026 | Commissioner Marta Kos | European Endowment for Democracy (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Cooperation of European Commission and the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) on democracy and rule of law |
| 3 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Vodafone Belgium SA (Companies & groups) | Upcoming EU legislation and challenges ahead |
| 20 May 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (Trade and business associations) | A simpler, clearer and better enforced EU rulebook |
| 19 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu | EIT Health | Relevant policy developments on EU level |
| 11 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Human Bridge Stiftelse (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Energiföretagen / Swedenergy (Trade and business associations); Stora Enso Oyj (Companies & groups); Avfall Sverige (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on implementation of EU legislation. |
Showing 12 of 60.
Eurojust Regulation Revision Although violations of EU restrictive measures involve foreign policy sanctions, Eurojust is predominantly an agency for internal criminal justice cooperation.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission proposes a new regulation on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) to repeal and replace Regulation (EU) 2018/1727. This initiative responds to an evaluation showing that while Eurojust is indispensable, its operations need greater efficiency and a wider mandate to tackle modern cross-border crime. The proposal expands Eurojust's competence into emerging areas such as cybercrime, gender-based violence, and violations of EU restrictive measures, while transforming it into a more proactive analytical hub. It also aims to streamline the agency's internal structure and improve cooperation with partners like Europol and the European Public Prosecutor Office.
- Repeals and replaces Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 to establish a renewed legal framework for Eurojust.
- Expands Eurojust's mandate to cover emerging crime areas including cybercrime, gender-based violence, and violations of EU restrictive measures.
- Transforms Eurojust from a reactive coordination body into a strategic and analytical hub for cross-border judicial cooperation.
- Standardises National Members' status and powers to improve governance and operational efficiency.
- Addresses findings from the 2025 evaluation regarding complex decision-making, wide case scope, and slow procedures with third countries.
- Aligns with related revisions of the Europol Regulation, the European Investigation Order Directive, and the European Union Data Protection Regulation.
What is asked: The Commission sought the views of citizens, Member States, and other relevant stakeholders on Eurojust and the Eurojust Regulation via an online public consultation to inform the impact assessment for the revision of the Eurojust Regulation.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
In the area of freedom, security and justice, the Union’s competence is shared (Article 4§2 (j) TFEU). 2. Subsidiarity Principle: Why should the EU act? 2.1 Does the proposal fulfil the procedural requirements of Protocol No. 21: - Has there been a wide consultation before proposing the act? - Is there a detailed statement with qualitative and, where possible, quantitative indicators allowing an appraisal of whether the action can best be achieved at Union level? In the context of the evaluation of the Eurojust Regulation (EJR) and impact assessment, the Commission conducted numerous consultation activities, including public and targeted stakeholder consultations. The consultations were carried out as widely as possible to receive relevant input, evidence and explanations of the needs of different categories of stakeholders.
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Subsidiarity grid Accompanying..., page 2 (EN)EN 4 EN mutual recognition and judicial cooperation embedded in the European Investigation Order (EIO) Directive9, which was also revised in parallel to this proposal. The proposal aligns with the strategic priorities identified in the Anti-Fraud Architecture (AFA) Review, particularly the White Paper for the EU's Anti-Fraud Architecture review10 which emphasises the need for complementary mandates, seamless information flow and operational synergies between Eurojust, OLAF, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), Europol and national authorities. By reinforcing Eurojust's role as a judicial coordination hub, the proposal ensures that its activities are fully integrated into the broader EU anti-fraud ecosystem, supporting the investigation and prosecution of PIF (Protection of the Union’s Financial Interests) offences and other forms of serious cross-border crime.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 5 (EN)Stakeholders also stressed the need for Eurojust to prioritise cooperation with third countries and invest in technological tools to respond to the evolving nature of crime. The online survey, which was open until 4 March 2026, targeted practitioners, Eurojust administration representatives and National Members, and public officials from both EU and non-EU countries. The survey results indicated broad support for governance reform, including the introduction of a Management Board to alleviate the College from administrative burden, and clarify the division of tasks. Stakeholders also agreed on the need to harmonise the status and powers of National Members and to strengthen cooperation with relevant EU agencies and bodies, such as Europol and the EPPO.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 7 (EN)
Who has already answered
5 submissions in the snapshot (3 from organisations), portal total 5. Feedback list on the portal.
3 of 3 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 3
-
Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. - HO für Mit-Opfer von Tötungsdelikten NGO, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
- Establish review, documentation, reasoning, and grievance mechanisms in cases of serious cross-border violence and homicides.
ANUAS therefore suggests that, in the event of serious cross-border problems, Offences of violence and homicide. Establish review, doc., reasoning and grievance mechanisms.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE - Oblige national public authorities to actively examine Eurojust referral and inform co-victims in a comprehensible manner.
Nation. Public authorities should be obliged to Actively examine Eurojust referral + inform co-victims in a comprehensible manner which authority is competent, whether Eurojust can be involved and why it may not be involved.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
- Establish review, documentation, reasoning, and grievance mechanisms in cases of serious cross-border violence and homicides.
-
Fundatia International Justice Mission Bucharest NGO, ROU; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: wants changes source
- Eurojust should develop and promote common operational procedures for complex cross-border cases to clarify responsibilities and guide victim-related actions.
Eurojust should develop and promote common operational procedures for complex cross-border cases.
- Victim-related coordination should be integrated into judicial cooperation from the earliest stage with dedicated contact points.
Eurojust should facilitate dedicated contact points or coordination mechanisms through which these matters are addressed alongside investigative and prosecutorial developments.
- Eurojust should facilitate Transnational Referral Mechanisms to ensure continuity of care and protection when victims cross borders.
Eurojust should facilitate Transnational Referral Mechanisms when victims return to their country of origin, relocate or participate in proceedings across jurisdictions.
- Eurojust should develop and promote common operational procedures for complex cross-border cases to clarify responsibilities and guide victim-related actions.
-
DigitalTrade4.EU Other, EST; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: wants changes source
- Ensure that interoperability features are designed with strict data control principles such as source authority and auditability.
At implementation stage, we recommend that interoperability be designed around source authority, provenance, purpose limitation, lifecycle control and auditability.
- Treat automated matching or analytical results as derived intelligence rather than authoritative evidence.
Automated matching or analytical results should be treated as derived intelligence, not as authoritative evidence or a substitute for prosecutorial or judicial decision-making.
- Measure data quality, false matches, and the effectiveness of human oversight during implementation and evaluation.
We therefore recommend that implementation and future evaluation measure not only the volume or speed of data exchange, but also data quality, false matches, manual follow-up, provenance completeness, correction propagation and the effectiveness of human oversight.
- Ensure that interoperability features are designed with strict data control principles such as source authority and auditability.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 May 2026 | Commissioner Marta Kos | European Endowment for Democracy (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Cooperation of European Commission and the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) on democracy and rule of law |
| 4 Sep 2025 | Commissioner Magnus Brunner | Ledger SAS (Companies & groups); Digital Currencies Governance Group Limited (Trade and business associations) | The European Commission's legislative work • in the fight against child sexual abuse (Regulation to prevent and combat child sexual abuse), • on lawful access to data for law enforcement (EU Protect Roadmap) and • on encryption (expected roadmap) |
| 20 May 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (Trade and business associations) | A simpler, clearer and better enforced EU rulebook |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | EUROGAS (Trade and business associations) | Implementation of EU legislation |
| 11 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Human Bridge Stiftelse (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Energiföretagen / Swedenergy (Trade and business associations); Stora Enso Oyj (Companies & groups); Avfall Sverige (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on implementation of EU legislation. |
| 8 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) | Feuille de route de la Commission européenne en matière de compétitivité et de souveraineté ; réforme des marchés publics ; Cyber resilience act ; localisation des data centers. |
| 22 May 2025 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Magyar Helsinki Bizottság (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Rule of Law, European Democracy Shield |
| 4 Feb 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Deutsche Telekom (Companies & groups) | Developments in European policies |
| 3 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Raffaele Fitto | UniCredit (Companies & groups) | General discussion on the priorities of the European Commission |
| 19 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu | EIT Health | Relevant policy developments on EU level |
| 22 Jan 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Stripe, Inc. (Companies & groups) | Discussion on the upcoming 28th Regime and the European Commission’s competitiveness agenda |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission. (Associations and networks of public authorities) | Exchange of views on issues on fundamental rights, Rule of Law and European Democracy Shield |
Showing 12 of 60.
Revision of EU rules on public procurement Public procurement is a horizontal EU rules file, and its preferences for strategic supply chains touch Egmont's European institutional and security interests only peripherally.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission proposes a revision of EU public procurement rules through a new regulation that repeals the existing 2014 directives on public procurement, utilities, and concessions. The initiative aims to modernize and simplify rules, reduce administrative burdens, and enable preferences for European products in strategic sectors to secure supply chains and add EU value. It also amends multiple sector-specific regulations and directives containing procurement provisions to improve coherence and transparency. Furthermore, the proposal addresses high administrative burdens and legal uncertainty identified in previous evaluations regarding public buyers and businesses.
- Revises and replaces Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU, and 2014/25/EU with a single Public Procurement Act regulation.
- Enables preference for European products in strategic sectors to ensure security of supply and EU added value.
- Aims to modernize and simplify rules, specifically considering EU start-ups and innovators.
- Amends various sector-specific regulations and directives that contain public procurement provisions.
- Addresses administrative burdens and legal uncertainty that currently affect public buyers and businesses, including SMEs.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
EN 9 EN • Collection and use of expertise The results of these consultations, and in particular of the open public consultation, were carefully taken into consideration in the preparation of the proposal. Respondents broadly agreed on the need to move beyond the lowest-cost paradigm, increase procedural flexibility and reduce administrative burden through full digitalisation, while strong support (exceeding 80% across all EU and EEA respondent groups) was expressed for prioritising European goods and services in strategic sectors, notably through the expansion of non-price criteria and the introduction of "European preference" mechanisms. SMEs identified simplification, digitalisation and improved data availability as key priorities and pointed to the difficulties caused by divergent national implementation. Their input directly informed measures aimed at facilitating SME access.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 10 (EN)• Stakeholder consultations In line with the Better Regulation Guidelines, the Commission conducted an ambitious and inclusive consultation process designed to gather reliable evidence from the full range of public procurement actors. A combined call for evidence and public consultation ran from 3 November 2025 to 26 January 2026, generating 745 and 1 037 responses respectively, from business associations, companies, public authorities, trade unions, NGOs and citizens, overwhelmingly from EU and EEA countries. The open public consultation was structured around three thematic sections: efficiency and transparency, the balance between green, social, innovation and other objectives, and economic security and strategic autonomy.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 9 (EN)EN 185 EN standards, Connect to the interoperability network Ensure access to procurement details Be connected to the electronic eligibi lity service Connect to the NPPS requirements. States to build the eProcurement platform that will be provided by the European Commission. Platform fully available as open source. Electronic eligibility service Article 133 The electronic eligibility service shall: Enable digital verification of company information, exclusion grounds, selection criteria and requirements of European Commission The platform will be developed to take into account accessibility requirements. It is aimed to reuse modules already existing in the European Commission, such as eCertis and the ESPD, to build the service and to connect it with digital business credential tool. Service fully N/A
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 186 (EN)
Who has already answered
14 submissions in the snapshot (11 from organisations), portal total 14. Feedback list on the portal.
11 of 11 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 10
-
- Maintain the legal form of directives instead of a regulation.
However, we are in favour of maintaining the legal form of the directives harmonising procurement law.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE - Delete the obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan.
The obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan is rejected.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE - Ensure contracting entities have the freedom to choose between lowest price and quality criteria.
contracting entities should be given the freedom to choose between awarding the contract to the tender offering the lowest price or evaluating tenders on the basis of quality criteria.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
- Maintain the legal form of directives instead of a regulation.
-
- Maintain the inclusion of Geographical Indications in the list of considerations for food procurement in Article 53.
Geographical Indications are included in this list of considerations.
- Maintain the inclusion of Geographical Indications in the list of considerations for food procurement in Article 53.
-
- Include an explicit opening clause in the new regulation that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality.
We therefore call for the new EU Public Procurement Regulation to include an explicit opening clause that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality, provided that the following minimum requirements are met: Independence of the audit body from the certified organisation Defined and documented audit scope Regular recertification at specified intervals Public verifiability of the certificate status.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE - Explicitly safeguard and perpetuate the practice of accepting quality management systems as proof of suitability through a clear opening clause.
The new regulation should explicitly safeguard and perpetuate this practice through a clear opening clause.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
- Include an explicit opening clause in the new regulation that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality.
8 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | SGI Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Revision of European public procurement rules |
| 22 Apr 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | European Disability Forum (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | European Single Market, Standardisation, Public Procurement, Intellectual Property |
| 23 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | France Digitale (Trade and business associations) | Public procurement, Common European Industrial Policy for Innovation and European Preference |
| 10 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | CONSEIL EUROPÉEN DES CHAMBRES D'INGÉNIEURS (Other organisations, public or mixed entities); Architects' Council of Europe (Trade unions and professional associations); Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-Conseils (Luxembourg) (Trade unions and professional associations); European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations (Trade and business associations) | Discussion on the upcoming revision of the public procurement Directives |
| 5 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Zentralverband Deutsches Baugewerbe (Trade and business associations) | EU procurement directives |
| 13 Apr 2026 | Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu | Social Services Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | APS, European Pillar of Social Rights, and the revision of the Public Procurement Directive |
| 26 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 4 Nov 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | European Federation of Public Service Unions (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 21 Oct 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) | Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 26 Jan 2026 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Companies & groups) | Discussion on EU public procurement rules including on plans regarding future European content requirements. |
| 19 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Compagnie de SAINT-GOBAIN (Companies & groups); Lysios Public Affairs (Professional consultancies) | Exchange of views on the revision of the Public Procurement Directives |
| 8 Apr 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Koninklijke Philips (Companies & groups) | Current economic situation (tariffs), EU regulation, Innovation, Single Market, Public Procurement, Sustainability, data Protection |
Showing 12 of 60.
Cloud and AI Development Act The focus on digital sovereignty touches foreign policy interests but the proposal is primarily a technical and industrial framework for data infrastructure.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission proposes the Cloud and AI Development Act to establish a framework of measures aimed at strengthening Europe's cloud and artificial intelligence ecosystem. The initiative focuses on three pillars, which include research and innovation for greening infrastructure, industrial investments to triple EU data processing capacity, and actions to increase secure data processing capacities for cloud providers in the EU. Ultimately, the proposal seeks to address infrastructure gaps, reduce critical dependencies on non-European providers, and enhance the Union's digital sovereignty and competitiveness.
- Addresses the EU gap in cloud and AI infrastructure capacity through three distinct pillars.
- Promotes research and innovation to accelerate sustainable cloud and AI computing technologies.
- Aims to triple the EU data processing capacity over the next 5 to 7 years via industrial investments.
- Introduces measures to increase secure data processing capacities for high-critical use cases.
- Establishes common criteria for sovereign cloud computing services to reduce extraterritorial dependencies.
- Promotes open-source solutions and joint public procurement activities across the public sector.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
It will be built on skills-related initiatives, including the Digital large scale skills partnership under the Pact for skills and the skills academies, including the AI Skills Academy. (26) The implementation of the Cloud and AI Leadership Initiatives should be entrusted to the Commission and Member States. The implementation of the Cloud and AI 16 Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030, (OJ L 323, 19.12.2022, p. 4, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2022/2481/oj). 17 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘The Union of Skills’, 5.3.2025, COM(2025) 90 final.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 21 (EN)20 ANNEX 2: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION (SYNOPSIS REPORT) 1. INTRODUCTION This annex provides a summary of the consultation activities undertaken to gather evidence and ensure that the public interest is well reflected in the design of potential policy measures for cloud and AI computing services development within the EU. It presents the range of stakeholders consulted, describes the main consultation activities and provides an analysis of their views and the main issues they raised. The objective of the consultation activities was to collect the views and experience of stakeholders on the key problems and associated drivers related to cloud and AI infrastructures in Europe, including current and future capacity needs, sustainability, investment conditions, and the availability of secure EU-based providers and services.
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 20 (EN)In its conclusions on the future of EU digital policy of 21 May 2024 (32), the Council of the European Union confirmed the relevance and importance of achieving this common approach by inviting the Commission to continue its support for the development of interoperable public digital services and the cross-border interconnection of public administrations’ infrastructure, including cloud and edge infrastructures, to increase their resilience, efficiency and sustainability. To achieve this common approach, it is necessary to establish the European public-sector cloud federation (‘the EuroCloud Federation’). The EuroCloud Federation should bring together national and European cloud initiatives that provide highly trusted and secure public-sector cloud capabilities and facilitate the sharing of such capabilities between Union entities and public-sector bodies.
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 33 (EN)
Who has already answered
118 submissions in the snapshot (41 from organisations), portal total 118. Feedback list on the portal.
41 of 41 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 1 supports 2 wants changes 29 9 held back for review (low confidence).
-
Europeans for Safe Connections NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: opposes source
- Add a new point to Annex I regarding health impacts and independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts in accordance with the precautionary principle.
Should the legislative process nevertheless continue, we recommend adding a new point to Annex I: 9. Grand Challenge 9: Health Impacts Development of independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts, including cumulative impacts and long-term monitoring, in accordance with the precautionary principle.
- Add a new point to Annex I regarding health impacts and independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts in accordance with the precautionary principle.
-
Transparent Edge Services S.L. Company, ESP; register: Professional consultancies model reads as: wants changes source
- Explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within the sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
To ensure a comprehensive approach, CADA should explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within its sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Incorporate a real 'evaluate once, use many times' principle by accepting existing national schemes and certifications as evidence of equivalent controls.
To achieve this, Articles 17 and 20 and Annexes II and III would need to incorporate a real 'evaluate once, use many times' principle.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Extend criteria regarding Union added value to any relevant procurement of cloud, edge and AI services and give them a significant minimum weighting.
In order for them to contribute effectively to reducing strategic dependencies, they should be extended to any relevant procurement of cloud, edge and AI services and be given a significant minimum weighting, adapted to the sensitivity and subject matter of the contract.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
- Explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within the sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
-
- Expand sustainable computational capacity.
we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
- Strengthen Europe's competitiveness in artificial intelligence.
we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
- Improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
- Expand sustainable computational capacity.
29 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Jul 2026 | President Ursula von der Leyen | Domyn SpA (Companies & groups) | Development of AI infrastructure, cloud services and AI applications in the EU |
| 16 Jan 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | UpCloud Oy (Companies & groups) | EU Cloud policy |
| 3 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) | EU Cloud policy |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | The Open Cloud Coalition (Trade and business associations) | EU Cloud Policy |
| 26 Jan 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Equinix (EMEA) Holdings B.V. (Companies & groups) | EU Cloud Policy |
| 22 Jan 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | European Sovereign Tech Industry Alliance (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | EU Cloud Policy |
| 22 Sep 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) | European Cloud Policies |
| 13 Oct 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | QTS Data Centers (Companies & groups) | European Cloud Policy |
| 14 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) | European cloud policies |
| 20 Nov 2025 | President Ursula von der Leyen | OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) | To discuss European Cloud and Data Strategy |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | France Digitale (Trade and business associations) | EU agenda on AI and tech sovereignty |
| 10 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | ASML Netherlands B.V. (Companies & groups) | EU agenda on AI and tech sovereignty |
Showing 12 of 60.