Independent demo, not an official EU site. AI summaries can be wrong; data from 5 Oct 2026. Disclaimer

AGORIA

Business association, Brussels, Belgium. EU Transparency Register entry

5 open consultations fit AGORIA.

Check each match yourself. In a blind test about half of the suggestions were a real fit (15 of 30). How it was measured

Open a consultation below to see what it is about, who has already answered and the key passages. Data from 5 Oct 2026.

Open consultations for AGORIA

Cloud and AI Development Act until 11 Nov 2026 good fit Strengthening European cloud and artificial intelligence infrastructure directly aligns with the mission of representing technology-inspired companies.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission proposes the Cloud and AI Development Act to establish a framework of measures aimed at strengthening Europe's cloud and artificial intelligence ecosystem. The initiative focuses on three pillars, which include research and innovation for greening infrastructure, industrial investments to triple EU data processing capacity, and actions to increase secure data processing capacities for cloud providers in the EU. Ultimately, the proposal seeks to address infrastructure gaps, reduce critical dependencies on non-European providers, and enhance the Union's digital sovereignty and competitiveness.

  • Addresses the EU gap in cloud and AI infrastructure capacity through three distinct pillars.
  • Promotes research and innovation to accelerate sustainable cloud and AI computing technologies.
  • Aims to triple the EU data processing capacity over the next 5 to 7 years via industrial investments.
  • Introduces measures to increase secure data processing capacities for high-critical use cases.
  • Establishes common criteria for sovereign cloud computing services to reduce extraterritorial dependencies.
  • Promotes open-source solutions and joint public procurement activities across the public sector.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. The use, reuse and promotion of open source in public administrations, will accelerate innovation allowing EU companies to compete in terms of performance, energy efficiency, and novel offers (PM20). All measures under this initiative are conceived to be in line with the EU’s international trade obligations. The initiative looks to incentivise local investment and aggregate demand by anchor customers, ensuring that competitive advantage is grounded in trust and operational excellence rather than on market power. Finally, the initiative seeks to enable European providers to gain market share at EU and international level, by equipping them with the necessary mechanisms to enhance the scale and scope of their service offering. In the mid to long term, the levers proposed in this initiative (e.g.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 179 (EN)
  2. Diverging public procurement practices for cloud and AI computing services and diverging sovereignty criteria may prevent providers from fully benefitting of the internal market. If EU intervention takes the form of a legislative proposal, it can be based on Article 114 TFEU. Article 173(3) TFEU is the basis for enhancing the EU’s competitiveness and innovation capacity. It enables measures to accelerate industry’s adaptation to structural changes; encourage an environment favourable to initiatives and to the development of undertakings throughout the EU, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings and favourable to cooperation between undertakings; and foster better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 27 (EN)
  3. fast-permitting, national facilitator, funding mechanisms, joint procurement, federation) to solve very clear challenges of today (e.g. sustainability, skills, leverage of open source, aggregation of demand, sovereignty) will allow European providers to expand their market presence, in the EU and beyond. Capacity to innovate CADA goes directly at the heart of improving the capacity to innovate (PM8, PM9) and the improvement of skills (PM23). The funding mechanisms (PM8, PM9), complemented with the cloud and AI adoption scheme targeted towards SMEs and the skills certification (PM23) will boost the capacity to innovate at product, service and process level. The spillover effects of research funds, where a myriad of EU stakeholders can participate (e.g.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 179 (EN)

Who has already answered

118 submissions in the snapshot (41 from organisations), portal total 118. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen70Business association14Company11NGO9Non-EU citizen7Academic or research institution3Public authority2Other2
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryESP33DEU16ITA6BEL6FRA6USA5AUT5GBR4DNK3IRL3

41 of 41 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 1 supports 2 wants changes 29 9 held back for review (low confidence).

  • Europeans for Safe Connections NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: opposes source
    • Add a new point to Annex I regarding health impacts and independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts in accordance with the precautionary principle.
      Should the legislative process nevertheless continue, we recommend adding a new point to Annex I: 9. Grand Challenge 9: Health Impacts Development of independent methodologies for assessing environmental and public health impacts, including cumulative impacts and long-term monitoring, in accordance with the precautionary principle.
  • Transparent Edge Services S.L. Company, ESP; register: Professional consultancies model reads as: wants changes source
    • Explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within the sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
      To ensure a comprehensive approach, CADA should explicitly include distributed edge computing, content delivery and network security services within its sovereignty framework, assurance levels and procurement provisions.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
    • Incorporate a real 'evaluate once, use many times' principle by accepting existing national schemes and certifications as evidence of equivalent controls.
      To achieve this, Articles 17 and 20 and Annexes II and III would need to incorporate a real 'evaluate once, use many times' principle.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
    • Extend criteria regarding Union added value to any relevant procurement of cloud, edge and AI services and give them a significant minimum weighting.
      In order for them to contribute effectively to reducing strategic dependencies, they should be extended to any relevant procurement of cloud, edge and AI services and be given a significant minimum weighting, adapted to the sensitivity and subject matter of the contract.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
  • Kaspersky Labs Limited Company, DEU; register: Companies & groups model reads as: supports source
    • Expand sustainable computational capacity.
      we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
    • Strengthen Europe's competitiveness in artificial intelligence.
      we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
    • Improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.
      we support the European Commissions objective to expand sustainable computational capacity, strengthen Europes competitiveness in artificial intelligence, and improve the resilience and security of digital infrastructure.

29 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups43Trade and business associations10Non-governmental organisations, platf.5Professional consultancies3not in register export2Academic institutions2Other organisations, public or mixed.1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
13 Jul 2026 President Ursula von der Leyen Domyn SpA (Companies & groups) Development of AI infrastructure, cloud services and AI applications in the EU
16 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen UpCloud Oy (Companies & groups) EU Cloud policy
3 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) EU Cloud policy
11 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen The Open Cloud Coalition (Trade and business associations) EU Cloud Policy
26 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Equinix (EMEA) Holdings B.V. (Companies & groups) EU Cloud Policy
22 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen European Sovereign Tech Industry Alliance (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) EU Cloud Policy
22 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) European Cloud Policies
13 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen QTS Data Centers (Companies & groups) European Cloud Policy
14 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) European cloud policies
20 Nov 2025 President Ursula von der Leyen OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) To discuss European Cloud and Data Strategy
11 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen France Digitale (Trade and business associations) EU agenda on AI and tech sovereignty
10 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen ASML Netherlands B.V. (Companies & groups) EU agenda on AI and tech sovereignty

Showing 12 of 60.

Minimum performance standards for data centres in Europe until 14 Dec 2026 good fit Mandatory performance standards for data centres directly target core digital infrastructure operated and developed by technology members.

Same initiative, also open: 26059

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission is preparing an initiative to establish common Union minimum performance standards for data centres located in its territory. Building on existing reporting and rating schemes under the Energy Efficiency Directive, the proposed regulation aims to phase out unsustainable practices and technologies in new or retrofitted facilities. The initiative seeks to address rising energy and water consumption, limited waste heat reuse, and regulatory fragmentation across Member States. An impact assessment is planned for late 2026, with a legislative proposal anticipated in the second quarter of 2027.

  • Establish common EU minimum performance standards for data centres regarding energy efficiency, water use, waste-heat reuse, and grid services.
  • Form the third step in the EU sustainability framework for data centres, following the 2024 reporting scheme and the 2026 rating scheme.
  • Prevent divergent national approaches and reduce regulatory fragmentation across Member States.
  • Improve sector competitiveness and reduce operational costs by cutting energy and water waste.
  • Support energy system integration by aligning data centre operations with power grid and heat network needs.
  • Prepare an impact assessment in Q4 2026 to support the drafting of the legislative proposal for Q2 2027.

What is asked: The consultation aims to collect in-depth evidence, information, data and feedback from stakeholders on the need for and feasibility of minimum performance standards for data centres in the EU, the most appropriate way to establish them, which indicators should have standards, and what thresholds should be set.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. Problem the initiative aims to tackle As highlighted by the Draghi report and the AI Continent Action Plan, expanding data centre capacity in the EU is essential for fostering AI innovation, accelerating digitalisation, boosting EU competitiveness across industries and supporting a mature data economy. To ensure this, several sustainability challenges need to be tackled: 1. rising energy and water consumption 2. limited waste heat reuse and energy system integration 3. the lack of a framework guiding data centres’ sustainability efforts 4. the lack of regulatory convergence between countries 5. competitiveness and affordability concerns 6. barriers to innovation and uptake of clean technologies Basis for EU action (legal basis and subsidiarity check) Legal basis The legal basis for this initiative is Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
    Establishment of common Union minimum performance standards for..., page 1 (EN)
  2. This sector touches upon two important EU objectives, namely the Union’s technological sovereignty and the Union’s energy resilience and security. Expanding computing capacities and increasing the number of data centres on the Union’s territory is essential, but it also poses challenges, not only in terms of increasing energy consumption but also for electricity grids, carbon emissions and environmental resources such as water. In response, the EU’s digital strategy emphasises the need for highly energy-efficient and sustainable data centres. As highlighted by the Draghi report on EU competitiveness, using energy more efficiently makes it possible to cut costs, which is vital for the competitiveness of European industries. The Energy Efficiency Directive (EU) 2023/1791 (EED) requires to promote energy efficiency and sustainability in data centres.
    Establishment of common Union minimum performance standards for..., page 1 (EN)
  3. CALL FOR EVIDENCE FOR AN INITIATIVE WITH AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE Data centres in the EU - Minimum performance standards LEAD DG (RESPONSIBLE UNIT) Directorate-General for Energy - Unit B2 on Energy efficiency (Policy and Financing) LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council INDICATIVE TIMETABLE Q2 2027 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Energy performance of data centres This document is for information purposes only. It does not prejudge the final decision of the Commission on whether this initiative will be pursued or on its final content. All elements of the initiative described, including its timing, are subject to change. A. Political context, problem definition and subsidiarity check Political context The information and communication technology (ICT) sector is one of the fastest-growing sectors in Europe and globally.
    Establishment of common Union minimum performance standards for..., page 1 (EN)

Who has already answered

23 submissions in the snapshot (5 from organisations), portal total 23. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen16NGO2Non-EU citizen2Other2Business association1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryITA6ROU4NLD2DNK1EST1FIN1FRA1CHE1IRL1JPN1

5 of 5 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 2 3 held back for review (low confidence).

  • Hydrogen Ireland Association Business association, IRL; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Recognise the role of hydrogen in providing zero-carbon backup and long-duration resilience.
      1. Recognise hydrogens role in providing zerocarbon backup and longduration resilience
    • Support onsite electrolysis and clean generation as part of data centre design.
      2. Support onsite electrolysis and clean generation as part of datacentre design
    • Reward flexibility services that reduce system costs and integrate more renewables.
      3. Reward flexibility services that reduce system costs and integrate more renewables
  • DigitalTrade4.EU Other, EST; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: wants changes source
    • Ensure binding thresholds are based on robust evidence rather than applied mechanically to an immature dataset.
      binding thresholds should be based on robust, comparable and enforcement-ready evidence rather than applied mechanically to an immature dataset.
    • Calibrate each KPI separately and keep measurement rules and methodology versions explicit.
      recommend that the Commission calibrate each KPI separately, keep measurement rules and methodology versions explicit
    • Avoid rules that unintentionally penalise AI, HPC, liquid cooling, necessary redundancy or economically proportionate retrofits.
      avoid rules that unintentionally penalise AI/HPC, liquid cooling, necessary redundancy or economically proportionate retrofits.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups33Trade and business associations15Other organisations, public or mixed.5Think tanks and research institutions4Non-governmental organisations, platf.4Professional consultancies3not in register export2
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
11 Jun 2026 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Data4 (Companies & groups) Data centers in Europe
9 Apr 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Everpure, Inc. (Companies & groups) Discussion on the energy efficiency potential for data centers
9 Apr 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Madoqua Renewables Holding (Companies & groups) Discussion on the energy efficiency potential for data centers
3 Apr 2025 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners P/S (Companies & groups) How Europe can build up the capacity of energy instruments capacity
17 Feb 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) European Commission Priorities
8 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné OVH Groupe (Companies & groups) Feuille de route de la Commission européenne en matière de compétitivité et de souveraineté ; réforme des marchés publics ; Cyber resilience act ; localisation des data centers.
8 May 2026 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Grundfos A/S (Companies & groups) Energy efficiency and data centres
9 Apr 2025 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Everpure, Inc. (Companies & groups) Energy efficiency, data centres
1 Oct 2025 Commissioner Ekaterina Zaharieva Commissariat à l'Energie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (Think tanks and research institutions) • EU R&I policies and recent initiatives related to energy • European Strategy on research and technology infrastructures • Commission’s proposal for the Euratom Research and Training Programme 2028-2034 • Developments in innovat
27 May 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Fortum Oyj (Companies & groups) Commission’s draft Delegated Regulation establishing a common Union rating scheme for datacenters
21 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Suomen itsenäisyyden juhlarahasto (Other organisations, public or mixed entities) EU data union
7 Jul 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Data4 (Companies & groups) General exchange on data centre infrastructure and its role in European digital and industrial competitiveness.

Showing 12 of 60.

Revision of EU rules on public procurement until 30 Nov 2026 good fit Public procurement rules enabling preferences for European strategic sectors directly affect market access for domestic technology providers.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission proposes a revision of EU public procurement rules through a new regulation that repeals the existing 2014 directives on public procurement, utilities, and concessions. The initiative aims to modernize and simplify rules, reduce administrative burdens, and enable preferences for European products in strategic sectors to secure supply chains and add EU value. It also amends multiple sector-specific regulations and directives containing procurement provisions to improve coherence and transparency. Furthermore, the proposal addresses high administrative burdens and legal uncertainty identified in previous evaluations regarding public buyers and businesses.

  • Revises and replaces Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU, and 2014/25/EU with a single Public Procurement Act regulation.
  • Enables preference for European products in strategic sectors to ensure security of supply and EU added value.
  • Aims to modernize and simplify rules, specifically considering EU start-ups and innovators.
  • Amends various sector-specific regulations and directives that contain public procurement provisions.
  • Addresses administrative burdens and legal uncertainty that currently affect public buyers and businesses, including SMEs.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. industries and jobs • The need for certification and traceability tools to ensure the credibility of Made in Europe requirements • The importance of considering the impact of Made in Europe criteria on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and ensuring that they do not create unnecessary barriers to entry or disproportionately affect certain industries or sectors. Some respondents also suggested that Made in Europe criteria should be applied in a way that takes into account the entire life cycle of a product or service, including its production, use, and disposal, and that they should be linked to EU environmental and
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 321 (EN)
  2. • Strategic sectors, without specifying particular ones • Personal protective equipment and healthcare • Steel, energy infrastructure, and construction, where demand certainty can accelerate decarbonisation and the circular economy • Key technologies such as AI, cloud, quantum, semiconductors, digital infrastructure and platforms, cybersecurity, defence, and space These respondents generally emphasized the importance of focusing on sectors that are critical to the EU's economic and technological development, as well as those that are essential for ensuring the EU's security and resilience. Overall, the comments suggest that the scope of Made in Europe provisions should be targeted and strategic, with a focus on promoting the EU's competitive advantages and protecting its critical interests.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 317 (EN)
  3. EN 24 EN procurements should be assessed based on an appreciation of all relevant interests taken as a whole, in particular economic, geopolitical and societal interests of the Union, its Member States and its citizens. The relevance of such Union interest is illustrated by sectors such as railways and shipbuilding which, as manufacturing sectors of a dual-use nature, rely on infrastructure, mobile assets and information and communication technology (ICT) and traffic management systems that must be resilient and are critical to military mobility, security, and the Union's strategic autonomy objectives. Their strategic importance has been underlined by recent Union initiatives including the EU Economic Security Strategy, the EU High-Speed Rail Plan, and the EU Maritime Industrial Strategy.
    Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 25 (EN)

Who has already answered

14 submissions in the snapshot (11 from organisations), portal total 14. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeCompany5Other5Non-EU citizen2EU citizen1Public authority1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryTUR3CHE1CHN1DEU1EST1FIN1AUT1ITA1NLD1PAK1

11 of 11 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 10

  • Landesregierung Public authority, AUT model reads as: wants changes source
    • Maintain the legal form of directives instead of a regulation.
      However, we are in favour of maintaining the legal form of the directives harmonising procurement law.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Delete the obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan.
      The obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan is rejected.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Ensure contracting entities have the freedom to choose between lowest price and quality criteria.
      contracting entities should be given the freedom to choose between awarding the contract to the tender offering the lowest price or evaluating tenders on the basis of quality criteria.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
  • Micro company, ITA Other, ITA model reads as: supports source
    • Maintain the inclusion of Geographical Indications in the list of considerations for food procurement in Article 53.
      Geographical Indications are included in this list of considerations.
  • Micro company, DEU Other, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
    • Include an explicit opening clause in the new regulation that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality.
      We therefore call for the new EU Public Procurement Regulation to include an explicit opening clause that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality, provided that the following minimum requirements are met: Independence of the audit body from the certified organisation Defined and documented audit scope Regular recertification at specified intervals Public verifiability of the certificate status.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Explicitly safeguard and perpetuate the practice of accepting quality management systems as proof of suitability through a clear opening clause.
      The new regulation should explicitly safeguard and perpetuate this practice through a clear opening clause.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE

8 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations25Companies & groups19Non-governmental organisations, platf.9Trade unions and professional associa.5Professional consultancies3Other organisations, public or mixed.2not in register export1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
18 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné SGI Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Revision of European public procurement rules
22 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Disability Forum (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) European Single Market, Standardisation, Public Procurement, Intellectual Property
23 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné France Digitale (Trade and business associations) Public procurement, Common European Industrial Policy for Innovation and European Preference
10 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné CONSEIL EUROPÉEN DES CHAMBRES D'INGÉNIEURS (Other organisations, public or mixed entities); Architects' Council of Europe (Trade unions and professional associations); Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-Conseils (Luxembourg) (Trade unions and professional associations); European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations (Trade and business associations) Discussion on the upcoming revision of the public procurement Directives
5 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Zentralverband Deutsches Baugewerbe (Trade and business associations) EU procurement directives
13 Apr 2026 Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu Social Services Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) APS, European Pillar of Social Rights, and the revision of the Public Procurement Directive
26 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
4 Nov 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Federation of Public Service Unions (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
21 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
26 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Companies & groups) Discussion on EU public procurement rules including on plans regarding future European content requirements.
19 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Compagnie de SAINT-GOBAIN (Companies & groups); Lysios Public Affairs (Professional consultancies) Exchange of views on the revision of the Public Procurement Directives
8 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Koninklijke Philips (Companies & groups) Current economic situation (tariffs), EU regulation, Innovation, Single Market, Public Procurement, Sustainability, data Protection

Showing 12 of 60.

Review of the International Procurement Instrument until 1 Dec 2026 good fit Reciprocal international public procurement access impacts international market development for European industrial and tech suppliers.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission is conducting a review of the scope, functioning, and efficiency of Regulation (EU) 2022/1031 on the International Procurement Instrument (IPI). The review evaluates the implementation of the regulation, including investigation processes, consultations, thresholds, exceptions, and the first adopted IPI measure regarding medical devices from China. It aims to assess the instrument's effectiveness in tackling procurement barriers in non-EU countries and ensuring a level playing field for EU operators. The findings will be presented in a report to the European Parliament and the Council by August 2027.

  • Review of the scope, functioning, and efficiency of the IPI Regulation pursuant to Article 14.
  • Assessment of investigation procedures, third-country consultations, thresholds, and types of measures.
  • Evaluation of the application and implementation of the first IPI measure concerning Chinese medical devices.
  • Analysis of the efficiency of online complaint tools and rules for determining origin.
  • Execution of a 12-week online public consultation through the Have your say portal.
  • Publication of a factual summary of consultation results and an implementation report to the European Parliament and the Council.

What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide views and evidence on the implementation, scope, functioning, and efficiency of the IPI Regulation in tackling non-EU procurement barriers, achieving market openness, and ensuring a level playing field, as well as the application of specific measures adopted under the Regulation.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. 4 We are consulting stakeholders to assess the implementation of the IPI Regulation in terms of: - the scope, functioning and efficiency of the Regulation in tackling non-EU countries procurement barriers, achieving openness of non-EU countries public procurement markets and ensuring a level playing field for EU businesses, goods, services and works; - implementation of specific measures adopted under the IPI Regulation. Target audience The target audience is composed of, in particular, interested parties affected by measures or practices in non-EU counties (e.g. businesses, business associations and cross-industry organisations), EU contracting authorities and EU contracting entities.
    Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the..., page 4 (EN)
  2. CALL FOR EVIDENCE FOR AN INITIATIVE This document aims to inform the public and stakeholders about the Commission’s work, so they can provide feedback and participate effectively in consultation activities. We ask these groups to provide views on the Commission’s understanding of the problem and possible solutions, and to give us any relevant information they may have. TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE International Procurement Instrument review LEAD DG - RESPONSIBLE UNIT Directorate-General for Trade & Economic Security - Unit B.3, Digital Trade, Intellectual Property and Public Procurement
    Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the..., page 1 (EN)
  3. B. What does the initiative aim to achieve and how The IPI is designed to promote market openness and ensure a level playing field for EU businesses, goods, services and works in third-country public procurement markets. The IPI Regulation requires continuous monitoring to: (i) ensure that the instrument remains coherent and efficient in tackling evolving public procurement market barriers in non-EU countries; (ii) provide the EU adequate leverage and the appropriate tools to create a level playing field for EU businesses, goods, services and works; and (iii) ensure a smooth application of measures adopted under the IPI. The Commission report will review the scope, functioning and efficiency of the IPI Regulation based on its implementation, in particular with regard to: (i) the scope of application of IPI; (ii) the rules of determination of origin;
    Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the..., page 3 (EN)

Who has already answered

6 submissions in the snapshot (1 from organisations), portal total 6. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen3Non-EU citizen2Company1
By country, top 4
Submissions by countryESP3GBR1ITA1TUR1

1 of 1 organisation submission analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 1

  • Mona Solutions Company, GBR; register: Self-employed individuals model reads as: wants changes source
    • Provide further worked examples on how origin is established and evidenced for complex economic-operator structures.
      Further worked examples should show how origin is established and evidenced in these circumstances, including what constitutes proportionate evidence where substantive business operations are not self-evident.
    • Make the applicability of an IPI measure clearly visible on TED alongside the relevant contract notice.
      We support making the applicability of an IPI measure clearly visible on TED alongside the relevant contract notice.
    • Provide further guidance on proportionate evidence, trigger points for verification, treatment of changes in subcontractors or supply chains, and record-keeping during contract performance.
      Further guidance would be useful on proportionate evidence, trigger points for verification, treatment of changes in subcontractors or supply chains, and record-keeping.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations24Companies & groups22Non-governmental organisations, platf.6Trade unions and professional associa.5Other organisations, public or mixed.3not in register export2
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
15 Dec 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Orgalim - Europe's Technology Industries (Trade and business associations) Exchange of views on the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) and reform of Public Procurement Directives
26 May 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné BUSINESSEUROPE (Trade and business associations) Review of the EU ETS Directive
10 Nov 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Infosys (Companies & groups) Implementation of the EU’s AI Act
13 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Confederation of Finnish Industries EK (Trade and business associations) Exchange of views on current and upcoming instruments of EU industrial policy
20 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen GLOBALFOUNDRIES Management Services Limited Liability Company & CO. KG (Companies & groups) Presentation of GlobalFoundries activities in the EU. Exchange of views on the Commission’s work on Chips Act “2.0”.
24 Mar 2026 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez OpenAI OpCo, LLC (Companies & groups) OpenAI activities and EU regulation
15 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné TotalEnergies Corbion B.V. Exchange of views on the Industrial Accelerator Act and EU regulation linked to chemical activities
19 Feb 2025 Commissioner Maria Luís Albuquerque Optiver (Companies & groups) Exchange with Optiver on Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 (IFR)
18 May 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné TIC Council (Trade and business associations) Exchange of views on the third-party conformity assessment and the revision of the New Legislative Framework as well as the Made in Europe initiative under the Industrial Accelerator Act.
13 Feb 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra eBay EU liaison office (Companies & groups) Discussion on the implementation and functioning of Council Directive (EU) 2021/514 ‘DAC7’
24 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Hydnum Steel, S.L. (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on the labelling and “Made in Europe” requirements under the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA).
16 Dec 2024 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez FIGIEFA - Fédération Internationale des Grossistes, Importateurs & Exportateurs en Fournitures Automobiles / International Federation of Automotive Distributors (Trade and business associations); European Principal Traders Association (Trade and business associations); European Association Automotive Suppliers (Trade and business associations); European Garage Equipment Association (Trade and business associations); European Council for Motor Trades and Repairs (Trade and business associations); Register ID 6025320863-10; Leaseurope (Trade and business associations); Insurance Europe (Trade and business associations) Exchange with the Independent Service Providers (ISPs) on the upcoming Commission Initiatives that will support the whole sector competitiveness, including the Competitiveness Compass, the Clean Industry Deal and the Automotive Industry Plan

Showing 12 of 60.

EU emissions trading system for maritime, aviation and stationary installations, and market stability reserve - review until 3 Nov 2026 good fit Revisions to industrial emissions trading and stationary installation benchmarks affect energy-intensive manufacturing members pursuing decarbonisation.

Same initiative, also open: 25760, 25761

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission has published an impact assessment and legislative review concerning Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 on the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and the Market Stability Reserve. This initiative serves as the first part of a broad post-2030 framework package aimed at driving competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisation. It evaluates how stationary installations, aviation, and maritime sectors can deliver necessary emission reductions while ensuring carbon leakage protection and orderly market functioning. The review addresses the shrinking supply of allowances and adapts the system to align with intermediate 2040 targets and 2050 climate neutrality goals.

  • Reviews the EU ETS and the Market Stability Reserve to prepare for post-2030 climate targets.
  • Assesses pathways toward the 2050 climate neutrality goal and the intermediate 2040 target.
  • Focuses on industrial sectors, maritime transport, and aviation to ensure cost-effective decarbonisation.
  • Examines carbon leakage protection, free allocation benchmarks, and the funding transition through EU revenues.
  • Analyzes market functioning and allowance supply adjustments to prevent trading frictions and price volatility.
  • Accompanies related proposals simplifying monitoring, reporting, and verification regulations.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. directing EU- funding to the most cost-effective projects (typically low-risk, mature ones, located in the optimal locations of the EU); and, supporting industry decarbonisation across all Member States to ensure that all MS decarbonise their industrial base, benefit from spillover effects and, in the long-term no opportunities are missed (countries/regions that are not successful in the EU-level competition might be hampered by lack of administrative capacity/lack of innovation ecosystem rather than structural factors of their industry/economy). . The Clean Industrial Deal highlights a fair geographical distribution of support needs to be ensured. Several options to achieve this balance: Table 14:
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 115 (EN)
  2. EN 10 EN contracts for difference, as part of a broader objective to mobilise EUR 100 billion for industrial decarbonisation. This proposal also extends the Innovation Fund and the Modernisation Fund. Endowed with 200 million allowances, the Innovation Fund will support innovative industrial technologies for industry and clean-tech manufacturing. The Modernisation Fund will channel the revenues resulting from the auctioning of 2,5% of the Art. 9 cap to lower-income Member States to modernise energy infrastructure, expand renewables, strengthen grids, improve energy efficiency, and support technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS). 2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY • Legal basis Articles 191, 192 and 193 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union empower the EU to act to preserve, protect and improve the quality of the environment;
    Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 11 (EN)
  3. Over the coming decade and to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, industry has to go through a significant transformation to modernise, decarbonise and switch to cleaner and more energy-efficient technologies, for example by electrifying, using hydrogen from renewable sources, deploying carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS), and generating carbon removals. At the same time, EU industry needs to remain competitive in a global market and ensure quality jobs, in line with the objectives of the Clean Industrial Deal. This transformation requires stepping up investments substantially. This includes a skilled workforce capable of deploying the technologies needed in relevant ETS sectors. For this, a predictable ETS price signal and targeted use of its revenues are essential. The EU ETS is a key financing mechanism for the green transition.
    Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE..., page 5 (EN)

Who has already answered

6 submissions in the snapshot (5 from organisations), portal total 6. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeBusiness association4Company1EU citizen1
By country, top 5
Submissions by countryCZE2BEL1DEU1SWE1USA1

5 of 5 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 3 2 held back for review (low confidence).

  • Svaz energetiky ČR Business association, CZE; register: Trade unions and professional associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Increase the allocation of the Modernisation Fund or develop comparable support mechanisms for countries with lower economic performance.
      Given the scale of investment needs, there is a need to increase its allocation or to develop comparable support mechanisms that take into account the higher investment intensity of the transition in countries with lower economic performance.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in CS
    • Remove or significantly relax the proposed conditionality of free allocation through decarbonisation plans.
      We therefore recommend that cross-compliance be removed or significantly relaxed.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in CS
    • Maintain free allocation for the district heating sector for the period 2031 to 2040.
      Maintaining the free allocation for district heating also in the period 2031 to 2040 is therefore necessary to maintain the investment capacity of the sector at a time of peaking transition needs.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in CS
  • Sysav Company, SWE model reads as: wants changes source
    • Ensure that the inclusion of Waste-to-Energy in the EU ETS is accompanied by effective measures and harmonised incentives for landfills to prevent waste diversion.
      The inclusion of Waste-to-Energy must be accompanied by effective measures for landfills.
    • Establish a credible and investable market for high-quality permanent carbon removals through central procurement, appropriate market demand, and robust certification.
      The review should also establish a credible and investable market for high-quality permanent carbon removals.
    • Ensure that EU ETS revenues and other funding instruments support carbon capture at Waste-to-Energy plants along with necessary transport and permanent storage infrastructure.
      EU ETS revenues and other funding instruments should support carbon capture at Waste-to-Energy plants, as well as the transport and permanent storage infrastructure required to bring these investments forward.
  • Svaz průmyslu a dopravy ČR Business association, CZE; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Ensure the availability of functional infrastructure, including carbon capture and storage technologies.
      Successful industrial decarbonisation and the necessary investments also require other conditions, such as available and functional infrastructure, including carbon capture and storage technologies, and above all a competitive electricity price, which has a fundamental impact on demand for greener products.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups25Trade and business associations15Non-governmental organisations, platf.12Think tanks and research institutions4Trade unions and professional associa.3Other organisations, public or mixed.3Professional consultancies3not in register export1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
10 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné NG Nordic AS (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on the review of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and the upcoming Circular Economy Act (CEA)
12 Jun 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Climate Action Network Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Réseau Action Climat France (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) 2040 climate targets, CISAF, European Competitiveness Fund, Clean Industrial Deal
21 Apr 2026 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez Öko-Institut e.V. (Think tanks and research institutions) EU ETS reform and 2040 climate target
11 May 2026 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Carbon Market Watch (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Decarbonisation and the upcoming review of EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS)
26 Apr 2026 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Ingka Services A.B. (Companies & groups); Inter Ikea Systems BV (Companies & groups) Decarbonisation and the upcoming review of EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS)
22 Jan 2025 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez Rabobank (Companies & groups) Discuss the European Commission's upcoming initiatives and the critical issues related to climate action - and transition finance.
15 Jul 2026 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez AIR LIQUIDE (Companies & groups) EU Emissions Trading System Review
1 Oct 2025 Commissioner Christophe Hansen Irish Environmental Network (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Sustainable Water Network (SWAN) CLG (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Discussion on the environmental and climate aspects of Commission's Post-2027 CAP proposal of 16 July 2025
28 Jan 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall APPLiA (Home Appliance Europe) (Trade and business associations) Discussion on 2026 EU policy priorities for sustainable products, circular economy, and regulatory coherence
8 May 2025 President Ursula von der Leyen Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); WWF Deutschland (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Germanwatch (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Klima Allianz Deutschland e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Deutscher Naturschutzring, Dachverband der deutschen Natur-, Tier- und Umweltschutzverbände (DNR) e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Bischöfliches Hilfswerk Misereor e.V. (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Exchange of views on the 2040 climate target, the EU Green Deal and the Clean Industrial Deal, and the Multiannual Financial Framework
22 Jan 2025 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen S&P Global (Companies & groups) Discussion on priorities and recent developments in the global and EU energy markets and themes shaping S&P Global Commodity Insights’ plans for CERAWeek 2025
9 Mar 2026 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical (Companies & groups) Simplification of the EU Climate Policy

Showing 12 of 60.