Independent demo, not an official EU site. AI summaries can be wrong; data from 5 Oct 2026. Disclaimer

EuroCommerce

Business association, Brussels, Belgium. EU Transparency Register entry

4 open consultations fit EuroCommerce, plus 1 possible fit.

Check each match yourself. In a blind test about half of the suggestions were a real fit (15 of 30). How it was measured

Open a consultation below to see what it is about, who has already answered and the key passages. Data from 5 Oct 2026.

Open consultations for EuroCommerce

Tackling unjustified territorial supply constraints in the Single Market until 4 Dec 2026 good fit Territorial supply constraints directly affect retailers ability to source goods across the EU single market.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission has launched a public consultation on territorial supply constraints, which are limitations imposed by large manufacturers to prevent retailers from buying products in one Member State and reselling them in another. These practices fragment the Single Market, limit consumer choice, and lead to significant price differences for daily consumer goods across the EU. The initiative aims to introduce new tools to address these constraints beyond situations currently captured by competition law, as announced in the May 2025 Single Market Strategy. This consultation gathers input from stakeholders to better understand the impact and scale of these supply restrictions.

  • Territorial supply constraints hinder retailers from buying goods in one Member State to resell in another
  • Such practices fragment the Single Market and limit consumer choice
  • They contribute to significant price differences for daily consumer goods across the EU
  • The initiative follows the Single Market Strategy announced in May 2025
  • New tools are proposed to address these constraints beyond existing competition law

What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide information and comments on territorial supply constraints, their impact on the Single Market, consumer choice, and retail prices, as well as views on potential tools to address them.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

The Commission has not attached a document yet.

Who has already answered

48 submissions in the snapshot (31 from organisations), portal total 48. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen16Business association13Company10Other4Public authority2NGO1Academic or research institution1Non-EU citizen1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryAUT10DEU8ITA3BEL3POL3CZE3ESP2EST2FRA2NLD2

6 of 31 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 1 wants changes 5 25 without readable text, so not analysed.

  • foodwatch NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: wants changes source
    • Adopt a binding legislative instrument rather than relying on self-regulatory codes of conduct.
      foodwatch welcomes the Commission’s intention to tackle unjustified territorial supply constraints (TSCs), but considers that only a binding legislative instrument can be effective.
    • Introduce legislation identifying prohibited practices to clearly outlaw cross-border refusal to supply, resale restrictions, and unjustified price discrimination.
      Legislation identifying prohibited practices: This is the most effective option.
  • Retail Ireland Business association, IRL; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Introduce a targeted EU legislative instrument, specifically a Regulation based on Article 114 TFEU, to address unjustified Territorial Supply Constraints.
      The European Commission should introduce a Regulation, based on Article 114 TFEU, to address unjustified Territorial Supply Constraints and improve the functioning of the Single Market.
    • Establish a clear non-discrimination principle ensuring buyers are not subjected to unjustified differences in access to goods based on their location.
      The framework should establish a clear principle that buyers within the EU should not be subject to unjustified differences in access to goods based on their location of establishment.
    • Implement a targeted prohibition of harmful practices that restrict cross-border sourcing without objective justification.
      The Regulation should identify and address specific practices that restrict cross-border sourcing without objective justification, such as:
  • Austrian Chamber of Labour (Bundesarbeitskammer - BAK) Other, AUT; register: Trade unions and professional associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Adopt clear legislation that identifies prohibited territorial supply constraints and establishes deterrent consequences.
      Das gelingt nur mit klaren Rechtsvorschriften, die verbotene Praktiken identifizieren und abschreckende Konsequenzen festlegen.

3 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations28Companies & groups26Non-governmental organisations, platf.3Professional consultancies2Think tanks and research institutions1Other organisations, public or mixed.1Trade unions and professional associa.1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
7 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné SMEunited aisbl (Trade and business associations) Implementation of the Single Market Strategy
16 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné AIM - European Brands Association (Trade and business associations) Discuss a leaked version of the Single Market Strategy as regards the proposed action on territorial supply constraints.
13 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné eBay EU liaison office (Companies & groups) Developing a horizontal Single Market Strategy and policies
14 May 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Forum of Securities Associations (Trade and business associations) Enforcement of Single Market rules
18 Nov 2025 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Companies & groups) Single Market Strategy
18 Nov 2025 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis MARKENVERBAND (Trade and business associations) Single Market Strategy
11 Jun 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EuroCommerce (Trade and business associations) Single Market Strategy
15 May 2025 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis AIM - European Brands Association (Trade and business associations) Single Market Strategy
23 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Miele & Cie. KG (Companies & groups) Current challenges in the Single Market, simplification initiatives
28 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Association des Centres Distributeurs E.Leclerc (Companies & groups) Importance of the Single Market for retail activities, Discussion on the forthcoming Single Marker Strategy with a particular emphasis on TSCs and the proposed Regulation on cross-border enforcement of the Unfair Trading Practices Directive.
4 Nov 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné WACKER CHEMIE AG (Companies & groups); LANXESS AG (Companies & groups); Fresenius SE & Co.KGaA (Companies & groups); MAN Truck & Bus SE (Companies & groups); Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (Companies & groups); Daimler Truck AG (Companies & groups); Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG (Companies & groups); Robert Bosch GmbH (Companies & groups); Covestro AG (Companies & groups); Mercedes-Benz Group AG (Companies & groups); MAHLE International GmbH (Companies & groups); Salzgitter AG (Companies & groups); EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Companies & groups); Bayer AG (Companies & groups); Carl Zeiss AG (Companies & groups); thyssenkrupp Steel Europe AG (Companies & groups); SEFE Securing Energy for Europe GmbH (Companies & groups); thyssenkrupp Decarbon Technologies GmbH (Companies & groups); Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations); Siemens AG (Companies & groups); TenneT Holding B.V. (Companies & groups); METRO AG (Companies & groups); EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG (Companies & groups); Commerzbank AG (Companies & groups) Overview of the Commission's Single Market Strategy.
5 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Akava ry (Trade unions and professional associations) Single Market Strategy, Competitiveness Fund.

Showing 12 of 60.

VAT and circular economy until 4 Nov 2026 good fit VAT rules on second-hand goods, donation versus destruction of unsold viable goods, and circular business models directly affect retail and wholesale operations.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission has launched a call for evidence for an evaluation and impact assessment running in parallel regarding VAT rules and the circular economy. The initiative aims to modernise selected value added tax rules that currently hinder circular business models, sustainable consumption choices, and the single market for secondary raw materials. It focuses on three specific pillars: second-hand goods, the donation versus destruction of viable goods, and VAT deduction rules for passenger cars. A legislative proposal is indicatively planned for the second quarter of 2027.

  • Evaluates and reviews current EU VAT rules to ensure they align with the circular economy and complement the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the Circular Economy Act.
  • Examines the VAT treatment of second-hand, refurbished, and remanufactured goods to address lack of deduction rights and complex margin schemes.
  • Addresses economic distortions where destroying viable goods is more advantageous under current VAT rules than donating them.
  • Considers aligning VAT deduction rules for passenger cars with sustainability objectives and zero-emission mobility goals.
  • Assesses policy options including mandatory or discretionary measures on vehicle deductions, harmonised margin schemes, and VAT relief on donations.

What is asked: The Commission asks respondents to provide feedback and evidence on the evaluation of current VAT rules and the impact assessment of potential policy options regarding second-hand goods, the donation or destruction of viable goods, and VAT deduction rules for passenger cars.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. Reducing resource dependencies and keeping materials in productive use for longer are important not only for achieving the EU’s environmental objectives, but also for improving its industrial competitiveness and economic security. This is reflected in the Clean Industrial Deal, in which the Commission identified circularity as one of the key enablers of a competitive and decarbonised European economy and announced a future ‘green VAT initiative’ (also referred to as ‘Circular VAT’). The importance of the circular economy for achieving the EU’s ambition to boost competitiveness and economic security will also be reflected in the forthcoming Circular Economy Act (CEA), which is intended to strengthen the single market for secondary raw materials and is scheduled for adoption in late 2026.
    Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as..., page 1 (EN)
  2. It is estimated that the remanufacturing sector alone has the potential to create 500 000 new jobs and could grow by EUR 69 billion by 20302. Focusing only on online recommerce, i.e. the resale of used products online (figures on the traditional bricks-and-mortar segment are unavailable), recent estimates put the value of second-hand goods sales in the EU at approximately EUR 94 billion3, with a projected annual growth rate exceeding 15% for 2027. Moreover, consumer engagement with this market is widespread. Nearly 87% of EU consumers are reported to have bought or sold second-hand goods4. However, at the other end of the spectrum, there are business models that rely on surplus production which potentially involve the destruction of unsold goods.
    Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as..., page 3 (EN)
  3. The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which entered into force in 2024 and is being progressively implemented, is a key instrument for making environmentally sustainable and circular products the norm. By establishing requirements relating to durability, repairability and reusability, which thereby support the repair- and second-hand markets, it prolongs product life and encourages customers to make more sustainable choices. In addition, the ESPR also addresses the destruction of unsold but viable consumer products by requiring economic operators to take all necessary measures to prevent them having 1 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/112/oj) Ref. Ares(2026)8589104 - 09/09/2026
    Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as..., page 1 (EN)

Who has already answered

22 submissions in the snapshot (13 from organisations), portal total 22. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen9Company8Business association2Academic or research institution1Environmental organisation1NGO1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryDEU4ITA3BEL3FRA2ESP2IRL1NLD1NOR1SVK1CHE1

13 of 13 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 12

  • Aliapur Business association, FRA model reads as: wants changes source
    • Extend the right to deduct VAT and the simplification and harmonisation of the margin scheme to all second-hand tyres in all segments.
      we fully support the extension of the right to deduct VAT and the simplification/harmonisation of the margin scheme to all second-hand tyres in all segments (light and heavy vehicles).
      machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
    • Include heavy goods vehicle tyre retreading within the scope of remanufactured goods eligible for the new VAT regime.
      we fully support the inclusion of PL retreading within the scope of “remanufactured goods” eligible for the new VAT regime.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
    • Exclude light vehicle tyre retreading from the favourable VAT regime until a reliable technical benchmark for retreadability exists.
      we do not support, at this stage, the inclusion of VL retreading in this same favourable regime.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
  • Micro company, DEU Company, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
    • Upcycling should be explicitly recognized as a distinct circular economic activity rather than being treated like simple second-hand resale.
      UPCYCLING should be recognised as a distinct circular economic activity.
    • The VAT system should be adjusted so it does not disadvantage businesses that use existing materials.
      The VAT system should not disadvantage businesses that use existing materials.
    • The administrative burden of the VAT framework must be simplified to accommodate micro-businesses and artists.
      The administrative system should recognise this reality. A circular VAT framework should be simple enough for a one-person business or small creative studio to use correctly without requiring disproportionate accounting resources.
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid Academic or research institution, ESP model reads as: wants changes source
    • Establish tax neutrality to remove bureaucratic barriers between refurbished and new goods.
      there is an urgent need to establish true tax neutrality that removes bureaucratic barriers on refurbished versus new goods.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
    • Abolish the right of deduction for the destruction of viable goods and facilitate donation through harmonised exemptions.
      It is also imperative to abolish the right of deduction for the destruction of viable goods, facilitating donation instead through harmonised exemptions.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
    • Make deductions for passenger cars exclusively conditional on zero-emission vehicles to decarbonise corporate mobility.
      Finally, to decarbonise corporate mobility, the new framework should make deductions for passenger cars exclusively conditional on zero-emission vehicles.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in ES

10 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations29Companies & groups22Non-governmental organisations, platf.10Other organisations, public or mixed.3Professional consultancies3Think tanks and research institutions3Trade unions and professional associa.1Self-employed individuals1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
28 Nov 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Norsk Hydro (Companies & groups) Circular Economy Act - End-of-Life Vehicles Regulation
21 Mar 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Fédération Internationale des Véhicules Anciens (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Upcoming End-of-Life Vehicle Regulation, Circular Economy Act and REACH
23 Apr 2026 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen Europex - Association of European Energy Exchanges (Trade and business associations) Protection of EU wholesale energy and environmental markets against VAT fraud
23 Apr 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Verband Österreichischer Entsorgungsbetriebe (Trade and business associations) Exchange with VOEB Board on the circularity priorities for the mandate
12 Mar 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative (Trade and business associations) Discussion on the upcoming Circular Economy Act
3 Jul 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Landbell Aktiengesellschaft für Rückhol-Systeme (Companies & groups) Discussion on the Circular Economy Act
4 Mar 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Novelis Europe (Companies & groups) Circular Economy Act and End-of Life Vehicles
10 Jun 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Paprec Group (Companies & groups) Circular Economy Act, ETS for municipal waste incineration
23 Jun 2025 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Plastics Recyclers Europe (Trade and business associations) The upcoming Circular Economy Act, enforcement of environmental legislation; simplification (together with Cab Ribera)
2 Jul 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Notre Europe - Institut Jacques Delors / Notre Europe - Jacques Delors Institute (Think tanks and research institutions) circular economy act
26 May 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall H/Advisors (Professional consultancies); Veolia Environnement (Companies & groups) circular economy act
4 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen Car Rental Coalition (Trade and business associations) Car Rental Coalition’s view on Commission initiatives

Showing 12 of 60.

Omnibus on taxation until 5 Nov 2026 good fit Corporate tax simplification directly affects large cross border retail and wholesale companies operating across the EU.

What the Commission proposes

The proposal introduces a Council Directive, known as the Omnibus on Taxation, which amends six existing directives in the field of direct taxation to simplify the EU corporate tax framework and support business growth and competitiveness. It aims to reduce administrative and compliance burdens for cross-border activities while maintaining high standards of protection against tax avoidance and abusive practices. The initiative aligns existing rules with international tax developments, such as the Pillar Two global minimum tax, and addresses procedural and legal obstacles in areas like withholding taxes and corporate reorganisations. Overall, the measures seek to improve legal certainty and ensure the coherent functioning of the internal market without lowering tax standards.

  • Amends Directives 2003/49/EC, 2009/133/EC, 2011/96/EU, (EU) 2016/1164, (EU) 2017/1852, and (EU) 2025/50.
  • Simplifies the Union framework on direct taxation to reduce compliance costs for businesses.
  • Eliminates overlapping provisions and addresses practical issues arising from the interaction with the Pillar Two Directive.
  • Removes procedural barriers and legal uncertainty linked to withholding tax relief.
  • Maintains existing safeguards and high levels of protection against tax avoidance and evasion.

What is asked: Respondents expressed their views on simplifying existing EU tax rules to improve the functioning of the internal market and enhance Europe's attractiveness for investment and business.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. 9 The Draghi report on EU competitiveness 10 European Commission, ‘A competitiveness Compass for the EU’, COM (2025) 30 Final 11 Among the key objectives of the Savings and Investment Union is the breaking down of barriers to integrated financial markets and supporting investments, as explained here: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/regulation-and-supervision/savings-and-investments-union_en#what 12 ‘Commission Recommandation of 2 July 2025 on tax incentives to support the Clean Industrial Deal and in light of the Clean Industrial Dearl State aid Framework’, C(2025) 4319 final. 13 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 relating to certain aspects of company law (OJ L 169, 30.6.2017, p. 46, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2017/1132/oj).
    Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directives 2003/49/EC,..., page 4 (EN)
  2. 38 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (Commission Staff Working Document), The EU Startup and Scaleup Strategy, COM(2025)270 final, pages 53 and 54. 39 M. Draghi, The future of European competitiveness (Part A, A competitiveness strategy for Europe), September 2024. 40 Ibid, p. 6. 41 European Law Institute, For a European Approach to R&D Tax Incentive(s), 2021. 42 D. D’Andria, D. Pontikakis, A. Skonieczna, Towards a European R&D Incentive? An assessment of R&D Provisions under a Common Corporate Tax Base, Working Paper No 69 - 2017, p. 4. 43 OECD R&D statistics released on 31 March 2026, cf. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/insights/statistical- releases/2026/03/oecd-overall-rd-growth-stable-government-rd-budgets-decline-and-reorient-towards-defence.html.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 14 (EN)
  3. 20 VVA/KPMG, Tax compliance costs for SMEs: An update and a complement Final Report KPMG/VVA 2022. 21 Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/34/oj).
    Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directives 2003/49/EC,..., page 28 (EN)

Who has already answered

5 submissions in the snapshot (4 from organisations), portal total 5. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeBusiness association3EU citizen1Other1
By country, top 5
Submissions by countryAUT1BEL1EST1HRV1IRL1

4 of 4 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 3

  • Wirtschaftskammer Österreich /WKÖ Business association, AUT model reads as: wants changes source
    • Urge the harmonisation of withholding tax relief procedures, evidence requirements and forms within the EU.
      We also urge harmonisation of withholding tax relief procedures, evidence requirements and forms within the EU.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Provide for an application date much earlier than 1 January 2037.
      In addition, in the interests of the location of the business, provision should be made for a much earlier application than that on 1 January 2037.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Harmonise the Beneficial Owner principle to address current legal uncertainty between Member States.
      We call for harmonisation and review only after the event.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
  • Irish Tax Institute Business association, IRL; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: supports source
    • Simplify EU tax rules and reduce compliance burdens for businesses.
      The Institute supports the objective of the Tax Omnibus Directive, together with the proposal for a Recast of the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC), to simplify EU tax rules and reduce compliance burdens for businesses.
    • Consider the attached Position Paper providing specific feedback on the proposed changes.
      The Institute invites the Commission to consider our Position Paper and we are available to answer any queries you may have in this regard.
  • EPRA (European Public Real Estate Association) Business association, BEL; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: wants changes source
    • Ensure the interest limitation rules are made uniform, mandatory and inflation-indexed.
      making the interest limitation rules (ILR) uniform, mandatory and inflation-indexed;
    • Exclude exceeding borrowing costs on low-risk third-party loans from the limitation.
      excluding exceeding borrowing costs on low-risk third-party loans from the limitation;
    • Extend the interest limitation rule exemptions to housing, including construction, transformation and renovation.
      and extending the ILR exemptions to housing, including the construction, transformation and renovation of buildings.

1 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations28Companies & groups22Non-governmental organisations, platf.6Trade unions and professional associa.3Professional consultancies3Other organisations, public or mixed.2not in register export2
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
27 Feb 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (Companies & groups) International and EU tax issues
18 Feb 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Mouvement des Entreprises de France (Trade and business associations) International and EU tax issues
17 Feb 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) International and EU tax issues
30 Jun 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra European Banking Federation (Trade and business associations) Taxation of EU’s financial sector
15 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Bundesverband deutscher Banken e.V. (Trade and business associations) Commission proposal for a harmonised corporate legal EU Inc regime
9 Sep 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Rud Pedersen Brussels (Professional consultancies) Insights from the US and the global accounting profession and discussing EU’s ongoing work on tax-related policies
24 Jun 2025 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez EUROGAS (Trade and business associations) Implementation of EU legislation
24 Feb 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Greenpeace European Unit (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) EU environmental tax issues
19 May 2025 Commissioner Dan Jørgensen APPLiA (Home Appliance Europe) (Trade and business associations) EU product legislation
18 Mar 2026 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Koch Government Affairs, LLC (Companies & groups) International taxation and simplification agenda
29 Jan 2025 Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra Vereniging VNO-NCW (Trade and business associations) Tax priorities under the new Commission mandate
26 May 2026 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis Bundesverband Güterkraftverkehr Logistik und Entsorgung (BGL) e.V. (Trade and business associations) Regulatory developments in the EU Transport Sector

Showing 12 of 60.

Revision of EU rules on public procurement until 30 Nov 2026 good fit Public procurement rules provide market opportunities for wholesale suppliers delivering goods to public buyers.

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission proposes a revision of EU public procurement rules through a new regulation that repeals the existing 2014 directives on public procurement, utilities, and concessions. The initiative aims to modernize and simplify rules, reduce administrative burdens, and enable preferences for European products in strategic sectors to secure supply chains and add EU value. It also amends multiple sector-specific regulations and directives containing procurement provisions to improve coherence and transparency. Furthermore, the proposal addresses high administrative burdens and legal uncertainty identified in previous evaluations regarding public buyers and businesses.

  • Revises and replaces Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU, and 2014/25/EU with a single Public Procurement Act regulation.
  • Enables preference for European products in strategic sectors to ensure security of supply and EU added value.
  • Aims to modernize and simplify rules, specifically considering EU start-ups and innovators.
  • Amends various sector-specific regulations and directives that contain public procurement provisions.
  • Addresses administrative burdens and legal uncertainty that currently affect public buyers and businesses, including SMEs.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. • The need for objective, transparent, and value-creation-based criteria that incentivize EU investment and promote vendor diversity • The importance of considering the origin of operators, including quality jobs, ownership, and tax residence, as well as EU added value • The need for clear definitions and application of Made in Europe criteria, with a focus on strategic industries and avoided blanket rules that could lead to cost increases and supply chain disruptions • The potential to link EU content provisions with sustainability performance, to support industrial decarbonization and innovation, and create green jobs in the EU • The importance of promoting collective bargaining, quality jobs, and regulating subcontracting to contribute to the Made in Europe objective • The need for consistency with EU and WTO law, to avoid discrimination and ensure that the rules are fair and
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 320 (EN)
  2. industries and jobs • The need for certification and traceability tools to ensure the credibility of Made in Europe requirements • The importance of considering the impact of Made in Europe criteria on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and ensuring that they do not create unnecessary barriers to entry or disproportionately affect certain industries or sectors. Some respondents also suggested that Made in Europe criteria should be applied in a way that takes into account the entire life cycle of a product or service, including its production, use, and disposal, and that they should be linked to EU environmental and
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 321 (EN)
  3. Obligations in relation to subcontracting (notably transparency) and clarifications on the link to the subject matter, among others, will have positive social impacts. Incentivising the use of the EU Ecolabel will facilitate green procurement for public buyers. FLX.2 will extend such procurement to concessions and improve coherence with sectoral legislation, for example regarding exclusion grounds. MPL.1 would facilitate the inclusion of environmental and social considerations in procurement procedures by making this less complex for public buyers, inter alia through the Eligibility Network which automates the verification of exclusion grounds and selection criteria (including environmental and social requirements). Interconnected EU tools such as the DPP (holding key product sustainability information) would help public buyers to compare products.
    COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT..., page 67 (EN)

Who has already answered

14 submissions in the snapshot (11 from organisations), portal total 14. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeCompany5Other5Non-EU citizen2EU citizen1Public authority1
By country, top 10
Submissions by countryTUR3CHE1CHN1DEU1EST1FIN1AUT1ITA1NLD1PAK1

11 of 11 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 10

  • Landesregierung Public authority, AUT model reads as: wants changes source
    • Maintain the legal form of directives instead of a regulation.
      However, we are in favour of maintaining the legal form of the directives harmonising procurement law.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Delete the obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan.
      The obligation to draw up and publish an annual needs plan is rejected.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Ensure contracting entities have the freedom to choose between lowest price and quality criteria.
      contracting entities should be given the freedom to choose between awarding the contract to the tender offering the lowest price or evaluating tenders on the basis of quality criteria.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
  • Micro company, ITA Other, ITA model reads as: supports source
    • Maintain the inclusion of Geographical Indications in the list of considerations for food procurement in Article 53.
      Geographical Indications are included in this list of considerations.
  • Micro company, DEU Other, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
    • Include an explicit opening clause in the new regulation that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality.
      We therefore call for the new EU Public Procurement Regulation to include an explicit opening clause that recognises independently verified sectoral qualifications as admissible proof of suitability and quality, provided that the following minimum requirements are met: Independence of the audit body from the certified organisation Defined and documented audit scope Regular recertification at specified intervals Public verifiability of the certificate status.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • Explicitly safeguard and perpetuate the practice of accepting quality management systems as proof of suitability through a clear opening clause.
      The new regulation should explicitly safeguard and perpetuate this practice through a clear opening clause.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE

8 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsTrade and business associations25Companies & groups19Non-governmental organisations, platf.9Trade unions and professional associa.5Professional consultancies3Other organisations, public or mixed.2not in register export1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
18 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné SGI Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) Revision of European public procurement rules
22 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Disability Forum (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) European Single Market, Standardisation, Public Procurement, Intellectual Property
23 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné France Digitale (Trade and business associations) Public procurement, Common European Industrial Policy for Innovation and European Preference
10 Sep 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné CONSEIL EUROPÉEN DES CHAMBRES D'INGÉNIEURS (Other organisations, public or mixed entities); Architects' Council of Europe (Trade unions and professional associations); Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-Conseils (Luxembourg) (Trade unions and professional associations); European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations (Trade and business associations) Discussion on the upcoming revision of the public procurement Directives
5 Feb 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Zentralverband Deutsches Baugewerbe (Trade and business associations) EU procurement directives
13 Apr 2026 Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu Social Services Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) APS, European Pillar of Social Rights, and the revision of the Public Procurement Directive
26 Feb 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
4 Nov 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné European Federation of Public Service Unions (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
21 Oct 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EUROPEAN TRADE UNION CONFEDERATION (Trade unions and professional associations) Exchange of views on the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives
26 Jan 2026 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Companies & groups) Discussion on EU public procurement rules including on plans regarding future European content requirements.
19 Mar 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Compagnie de SAINT-GOBAIN (Companies & groups); Lysios Public Affairs (Professional consultancies) Exchange of views on the revision of the Public Procurement Directives
8 Apr 2025 Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné Koninklijke Philips (Companies & groups) Current economic situation (tariffs), EU regulation, Innovation, Single Market, Public Procurement, Sustainability, data Protection

Showing 12 of 60.

Review of the Brussels Ia Regulation until 24 Nov 2026 possible fit Civil and commercial jurisdiction rules affect cross border business contracts for large commercial traders.

Same initiative, also open: 25820

What the Commission proposes

The European Commission has launched an initiative to review Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The initiative aims to simplify, clarify, and modernize the existing rules to reduce litigation costs, address legal fragmentation, and support the EU single market and competitiveness. It will be supported by a back-to-back evaluation and impact assessment, with a legislative proposal planned for the fourth quarter of 2027. The review addresses challenges identified in an application report, stakeholder consultations, and Court of Justice case law.

  • Review and potential legislative amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
  • Address inconsistent jurisdiction rules, particularly for defendants outside the EU.
  • Improve procedural tools for collective redress and assess aspects relevant to strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPs).
  • Evaluate parallel cross-border enforcement mechanisms under Regulation (EC) 805/2004.
  • Consider policy options ranging from the baseline scenario to targeted clarification, simplification, and modernization.
  • Planned adoption of the initiative in the fourth quarter of 2027.

What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide views on the Commission's understanding of the problem and possible solutions, and to give any relevant information including on the possible impacts of the different options.

Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.

Key passages on your topics

  1. In this context, the Regulation is a key enabler for the EU’s single market, including by creating an attractive business environment, and for the EU’s competitiveness, as recognised most recently in the Commission’s Communication towards a 28th regime for EU companies (COM(2026) 320 final). The Report on the application of the Brussels Ia Regulation (the Application Report) found that after over 10 years, the Regulation largely meets its goals of legal certainty and streamlined enforcement but identified areas that could benefit from clarification, simplification and modernisation. For example, the Application Report noted inconsistent jurisdiction rules for defendants outside the EU, creating an uneven playing field; it referred to the possible simplification of the jurisdictional rules concerning contractual and tort claims as well as of the specific provisions on consumer contracts;
    Recast of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament..., page 1 (EN)
  2. 4 This option includes everything set out in Option 2 but adds more substantial amendments to the Regulation, such as the introduction of jurisdictional rules for defendants domiciled in non-EU countries and specific new rules on collective redress actions. C. Likely impacts 1. Economic impacts, including the impact on competitiveness The initiative is expected to strengthen legal certainty and predictability and improve the competitiveness of EU companies by ensuring a level playing field between EU and non-EU businesses and individuals involved in international transactions. In this context, the initiative is expected to contribute, in particular, to reducing litigation costs and increasing confidence in cross-border dealings, particularly for SMEs and start-ups. 2.
    Recast of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament..., page 4 (EN)
  3. TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE Review of EU rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters LEAD DG - RESPONSIBLE UNIT DG JUST (Unit A2) LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE Legislative proposal amending Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) INDICATIVE PLANNING Q4-2027 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters | European e- Justice Portal
    Recast of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament..., page 1 (EN)

Who has already answered

16 submissions in the snapshot (8 from organisations), portal total 16. Feedback list on the portal.

By stakeholder type (as declared on the portal)
Submissions by stakeholder typeEU citizen8Company2Other2Public authority2Consumer organisation1NGO1
By country, top 8
Submissions by countrySVK5DEU4NLD2POL1BEL1USA1EST1FRA1

8 of 8 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 8

  • Micro company, POL Company, POL model reads as: wants changes source
    • Provide for a single forum for the provision of services and define it with sufficient clarity to ensure legal certainty.
      In view of the ambiguity and the considerable dependence on the opinion of the court concerned, it is necessary, in accordance with the principle of legal certainty to which R 1215/2012 acquiesces, to provide for a single forum and to define it with sufficient clarity.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in PL
    • Make certificates needed to enforce a judgment abroad multilingual from the outset to avoid translation costs.
      Certificates needed to enforce a judgment abroad should be multilingual from the outset, such as multilingual death certificates.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in PL
    • Supplement Article 17 by consumer relations to simplify determining the competent court in the event of compensation by air.
      Article 17 should be supplemented by consumer relations, which are currently governed by the section of the contract of carriage, which makes it quite difficult to determine the competent court in the event of compensation by air
      machine translation by the Commission, original in PL
  • Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. - HO für Mit-Opfer von Tötungsdelikten NGO, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
    • ANUAS suggests evaluating Article 7(2) and (3) also from the perspective of victims of serious acts of violence and co-victims of homicide.
      ANUAS therefore suggests expressly evaluating Article 7(2) and (3) also from the perspective of victims of serious acts of violence and co-victims of homicide.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • The organisation recommends the introduction of more uniform European rules on jurisdiction and consideration of a narrowly circumscribed forum necessitatis.
      More uniform European rules on jurisdiction and consideration of a narrowly circumscribed forum necessitatis therefore seem appropriate.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
    • ANUAS recommends that access to justice for victims of serious crime be included in the review as a separate assessment criterion and that cross-border enforcement channels be simplified.
      ANUAS therefore recommends, in particular, that access to justice for victims of serious crime be included in the review as a separate assessment criterion, that Article 7(3) be examined separately from the perspective of victims, that cross-border enforcement channels be simplified and that victims’ organisations be systematically included in the further impact assessment.
      machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
  • DigitalTrade4.EU Other, EST; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: wants changes source
    • Consider trusted, machine-verifiable judicial status information as part of the modernisation review.
      We recommend that the review consider trusted, machine-verifiable judicial status information as part of this modernisation.
    • Measure end-to-end enforcement friction in the impact assessment.
      The impact assessment should also measure end-to-end enforcement friction, including verification time, procedural exceptions, legal cost, enforcement duration and the period during which claims, receivables or collateral remain economically unresolved.
    • Use identified material interoperability gaps to inform Horizon Europe 2028+ and related EU R&I priorities.
      Where material interoperability gaps are identified, they should inform Horizon Europe 2028+ and related EU R&I priorities, supporting cross-border pilots on trusted judicial-status interoperability before wider deployment.

5 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.

Who met the Commission about it

60 meetings, approximate

subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.

These 60 meetings by register category of the interest representatives (a meeting with participants from two categories counts in both)
Meetings by register category of the participantsCompanies & groups30Trade and business associations18Non-governmental organisations, platf.6Trade unions and professional associa.3Other organisations, public or mixed.2not in register export2Think tanks and research institutions1Associations and networks of public a.1
DateCabinetInterest representativeSubject as recorded
1 Jun 2026 President Ursula von der Leyen Aercap Holdings NV (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU Taxonomy Regulation
20 May 2026 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (Trade and business associations) A simpler, clearer and better enforced EU rulebook
14 Sep 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) BDI-Proposal: European regulation establishing uniform European administrative procedural rules for permitting and notification procedures
24 Jun 2025 Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez EUROGAS (Trade and business associations) Implementation of EU legislation
11 Sep 2026 Commissioner Jessika Roswall Human Bridge Stiftelse (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Energiföretagen / Swedenergy (Trade and business associations); Stora Enso Oyj (Companies & groups); Avfall Sverige (Trade and business associations) Exchange of views on implementation of EU legislation.
26 May 2026 Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis Bundesverband Güterkraftverkehr Logistik und Entsorgung (BGL) e.V. (Trade and business associations) Regulatory developments in the EU Transport Sector
16 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Roblox Corporation (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy
16 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Electronic Arts Inc. (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy
16 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Google Ireland Limited and its affiliates (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy
16 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Meta Platforms Ireland Limited and its various subsidiaries (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy
16 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Apple Inc. (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy
15 Apr 2026 Commissioner Michael McGrath Anthropic, PBC (Companies & groups) Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy

Showing 12 of 60.