Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs BEUC
NGO, Brussels, Belgium. EU Transparency Register entry
4 open consultations fit BEUC, plus 1 possible fit.
Check each match yourself. In a blind test about half of the suggestions were a real fit (15 of 30). How it was measured
- Best fit: Tackling unjustified territorial supply constraints in the Single Market until 4 Dec 2026
- Closing soonest: VAT and circular economy until 4 Nov 2026
Open a consultation below to see what it is about, who has already answered and the key passages. Data from 5 Oct 2026.
Open consultations for BEUC
Tackling unjustified territorial supply constraints in the Single Market Territorial supply constraints directly affect consumer goods availability and retail prices for consumers across the single market.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission has launched a public consultation on territorial supply constraints, which are limitations imposed by large manufacturers to prevent retailers from buying products in one Member State and reselling them in another. These practices fragment the Single Market, limit consumer choice, and lead to significant price differences for daily consumer goods across the EU. The initiative aims to introduce new tools to address these constraints beyond situations currently captured by competition law, as announced in the May 2025 Single Market Strategy. This consultation gathers input from stakeholders to better understand the impact and scale of these supply restrictions.
- Territorial supply constraints hinder retailers from buying goods in one Member State to resell in another
- Such practices fragment the Single Market and limit consumer choice
- They contribute to significant price differences for daily consumer goods across the EU
- The initiative follows the Single Market Strategy announced in May 2025
- New tools are proposed to address these constraints beyond existing competition law
What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide information and comments on territorial supply constraints, their impact on the Single Market, consumer choice, and retail prices, as well as views on potential tools to address them.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
The Commission has not attached a document yet.
Who has already answered
48 submissions in the snapshot (31 from organisations), portal total 48. Feedback list on the portal.
6 of 31 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 1 wants changes 5 25 without readable text, so not analysed.
-
foodwatch NGO, BEL; register: Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar model reads as: wants changes source
- Adopt a binding legislative instrument rather than relying on self-regulatory codes of conduct.
foodwatch welcomes the Commission’s intention to tackle unjustified territorial supply constraints (TSCs), but considers that only a binding legislative instrument can be effective.
- Introduce legislation identifying prohibited practices to clearly outlaw cross-border refusal to supply, resale restrictions, and unjustified price discrimination.
Legislation identifying prohibited practices: This is the most effective option.
- Adopt a binding legislative instrument rather than relying on self-regulatory codes of conduct.
-
Retail Ireland Business association, IRL; register: Trade and business associations model reads as: wants changes source
- Introduce a targeted EU legislative instrument, specifically a Regulation based on Article 114 TFEU, to address unjustified Territorial Supply Constraints.
The European Commission should introduce a Regulation, based on Article 114 TFEU, to address unjustified Territorial Supply Constraints and improve the functioning of the Single Market.
- Establish a clear non-discrimination principle ensuring buyers are not subjected to unjustified differences in access to goods based on their location.
The framework should establish a clear principle that buyers within the EU should not be subject to unjustified differences in access to goods based on their location of establishment.
- Implement a targeted prohibition of harmful practices that restrict cross-border sourcing without objective justification.
The Regulation should identify and address specific practices that restrict cross-border sourcing without objective justification, such as:
- Introduce a targeted EU legislative instrument, specifically a Regulation based on Article 114 TFEU, to address unjustified Territorial Supply Constraints.
-
Austrian Chamber of Labour (Bundesarbeitskammer - BAK) Other, AUT; register: Trade unions and professional associations model reads as: wants changes source
- Adopt clear legislation that identifies prohibited territorial supply constraints and establishes deterrent consequences.
Das gelingt nur mit klaren Rechtsvorschriften, die verbotene Praktiken identifizieren und abschreckende Konsequenzen festlegen.
- Adopt clear legislation that identifies prohibited territorial supply constraints and establishes deterrent consequences.
3 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | SMEunited aisbl (Trade and business associations) | Implementation of the Single Market Strategy |
| 16 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | AIM - European Brands Association (Trade and business associations) | Discuss a leaked version of the Single Market Strategy as regards the proposed action on territorial supply constraints. |
| 13 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | eBay EU liaison office (Companies & groups) | Developing a horizontal Single Market Strategy and policies |
| 14 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | European Forum of Securities Associations (Trade and business associations) | Enforcement of Single Market rules |
| 18 Nov 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Companies & groups) | Single Market Strategy |
| 18 Nov 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | MARKENVERBAND (Trade and business associations) | Single Market Strategy |
| 11 Jun 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | EuroCommerce (Trade and business associations) | Single Market Strategy |
| 15 May 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | AIM - European Brands Association (Trade and business associations) | Single Market Strategy |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Miele & Cie. KG (Companies & groups) | Current challenges in the Single Market, simplification initiatives |
| 28 Apr 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Association des Centres Distributeurs E.Leclerc (Companies & groups) | Importance of the Single Market for retail activities, Discussion on the forthcoming Single Marker Strategy with a particular emphasis on TSCs and the proposed Regulation on cross-border enforcement of the Unfair Trading Practices Directive. |
| 4 Nov 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | WACKER CHEMIE AG (Companies & groups); LANXESS AG (Companies & groups); Fresenius SE & Co.KGaA (Companies & groups); MAN Truck & Bus SE (Companies & groups); Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (Companies & groups); Daimler Truck AG (Companies & groups); Diehl Stiftung & Co. KG (Companies & groups); Robert Bosch GmbH (Companies & groups); Covestro AG (Companies & groups); Mercedes-Benz Group AG (Companies & groups); MAHLE International GmbH (Companies & groups); Salzgitter AG (Companies & groups); EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Companies & groups); Bayer AG (Companies & groups); Carl Zeiss AG (Companies & groups); thyssenkrupp Steel Europe AG (Companies & groups); SEFE Securing Energy for Europe GmbH (Companies & groups); thyssenkrupp Decarbon Technologies GmbH (Companies & groups); Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations); Siemens AG (Companies & groups); TenneT Holding B.V. (Companies & groups); METRO AG (Companies & groups); EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG (Companies & groups); Commerzbank AG (Companies & groups) | Overview of the Commission's Single Market Strategy. |
| 5 Mar 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Akava ry (Trade unions and professional associations) | Single Market Strategy, Competitiveness Fund. |
Showing 12 of 60.
Child Safety Online Protecting minor users on digital platforms and social media is a core consumer protection and digital safety priority.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission proposes the EU Kids Act regulation to establish a uniform digital environment for children across the European Union. The proposal introduces harmonized age limits, restricting autonomous account creation on social media and video sharing platforms for children under 15, with parental involvement allowed for older minors. It also sets out security-by-design requirements for online services, video sharing platforms, online games, AI companions, and app stores. Furthermore, the regulation establishes proportionate, privacy-compliant age-verification frameworks and harmonized enforcement mechanisms to prevent market fragmentation.
- Establishes a single EU-wide digital age limit and restricts autonomous account creation on social media and video sharing platforms for children under 15.
- Sets out security-by-design requirements for social media, video platforms, online games, AI companions, and app stores.
- Introduces proportional and privacy-respecting age-verification criteria and safeguards.
- Defines a structured enforcement framework relying on existing structures with expedited procedures.
- Builds on existing EU rules such as the Digital Services Act and the Artificial Intelligence Act to prevent regulatory fragmentation in the single market.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
The Commission document is in FR; open to read the 3 passages in that language.
FR 42 FR la fiabilité, la robustesse, la non-intrusion, la protection de la vie privée et la non- discrimination. (63) Reconnaissant qu’une protection efficace des mineurs nécessite non seulement des mesures réglementaires, mais aussi des actions de sensibilisation, d’éducation et d’autonomisation, les États membres devraient mettre en place des stratégies nationales en s’appuyant sur la communication de la Commission au Parlement européen, au Conseil, au Comité économique et social européen et au Comité des régions du 11 mai 2022 intitulée «Une décennie numérique pour les enfants et les jeunes:
Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL..., page 43 (FR)LE PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROPÉENNE, vu le traité sur le fonctionnement de l’Union européenne, et notamment son article 114, vu la proposition de la Commission européenne, après transmission du projet d’acte législatif aux parlements nationaux, vu l’avis du Comité économique et social européen1, vu l'avis du Comité des régions2, statuant conformément à la procédure législative ordinaire, considérant ce qui suit: (1) Les services de réseaux sociaux en ligne, les services de plateformes de partage de vidéos, les compagnons d’intelligence artificielle (IA), les agents conversationnels généralistes, les jeux en ligne et les boutiques d’applications logicielles sont devenus un élément important de la vie quotidienne des mineurs.
Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL..., page 18 (FR)Il devrait être possible d’appuyer ces activités, y compris celles menées par les centres pour un internet plus sûr, au moyen de financements de l’Union mis à disposition au titre des programmes et instruments pertinents de l’Union établis dans le cadre financier pluriannuel, tels que les plans de partenariat national et régional. Afin de renforcer l’efficacité de la mise en œuvre, les États membres devraient communiquer les mesures prises à la Commission, et cette dernière devrait faciliter l’échange de bonnes pratiques entre les États membres. (64) Le présent règlement devrait préciser certaines dispositions du règlement (UE) 2022/2065.
Proposition de RÈGLEMENT DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN ET DU CONSEIL..., page 43 (FR)
Who has already answered
1,507 submissions in the snapshot (15 from organisations), portal total 1,507. Feedback list on the portal.
15 of 15 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: opposes 6 wants changes 7 2 held back for review (low confidence).
-
- Explicitly state children's rights under Article 24 of the Charter and UNCRC General Comment No. 25 in the text.
Children's rights under Article 24 of the Charter and UNCRC General Comment No. 25 should be stated explicitly in the text.
- Prohibit simulated intimacy and require crisis protocols for harmful content.
Prohibit AI that: claims to be human; engages in romantic or sexual role-play; guilt-trips children or discourages human relationships; asks children to keep secrets.
- Ban training models on children's conversations, emotional profiling, and in-chat advertising.
Ban training models on children's conversations, emotional profiling and in-chat advertising.
- Explicitly state children's rights under Article 24 of the Charter and UNCRC General Comment No. 25 in the text.
-
- Remove mandatory age gates for social media and video-sharing platforms that lead to privacy-intrusive age verification.
1. mandatory age gates for social media and video-sharing platform, leading to privacy-intrusive age verification;
- Reconsider safety by design measures that raise concerns about product-safety doctrines in speech regulation and federated services.
2. certain safety by design measures, raising concerns about product-safety doctrines in speech regulation and their application to federated services; and
- Address regulatory overlap with the EU's Digital Fairness Act agenda to avoid undermining consumer law.
3. regulatory overlap with the EU's Digital Fairness Act agenda, risking undermining useful additions to the consumer law acquis.
- Remove mandatory age gates for social media and video-sharing platforms that lead to privacy-intrusive age verification.
-
Faculty of Laws, University College London Academic or research institution, GBR model reads as: wants changes source
- Address significant drafting errors and scope challenges arising from the reuse of Digital Markets Act definitions.
Reuse of DMA definitions, which are designed for designation within, creates significant scope challenges.
- Refine the overly broad risk criteria for Article 6 to avoid unintentionally capturing non-risky services.
Risk criteria for Art 6 so broad to capture non-risky services, just because they are designed to incentivise interaction (as so many services are).
- Clarify parental responsibility provisions to better account for complex family situations and domestic abuse risks.
Parental responsibility is not held as digital data (e.g. court orders) for complex families, domestic abuse, etc.
- Address significant drafting errors and scope challenges arising from the reuse of Digital Markets Act definitions.
10 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Jan 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Highgate Advisory Ltd (Professional consultancies) | Online child protection and societal impact of technology |
| 22 Jan 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Highgate Advisory Ltd (Professional consultancies) | Online child protection and societal impact of technology |
| 8 Apr 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Common Sense Media | Protection of children online |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | OpenAI OpCo, LLC (Companies & groups) | Discussion on the Digital Fairness Act, youth protection online and regulatory simplification |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Supercell Oy | Digital Fairness Act, Online protection of minors |
| 25 Feb 2026 | Commissioner Magnus Brunner | Eurochild AISBL (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Children’s rights in the digital environment |
| 5 Feb 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Eurochild AISBL (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Policies for children in the digital space |
| 4 May 2026 | President Ursula von der Leyen | OpenAI OpCo, LLC (Companies & groups) | Child safety online and competitiveness |
| 13 Apr 2026 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | Centre for Democracy & Technology, Europe (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | EU policies and regulatory enforcement in the digital and AI areas |
| 28 May 2026 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Netflix International B.V. (Companies & groups) | Digital Fairness Act, recommender systems, protection of minors |
| 3 Jun 2026 | President Ursula von der Leyen | Apple Inc. (Companies & groups) | Protection of minors online |
| 8 May 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Snap, Inc. (Companies & groups) | Protection of minors online |
Showing 12 of 60.
Review of the Brussels Ia Regulation Cross-border jurisdiction and enforcement of civil judgments directly impact consumers seeking legal redress against foreign traders.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
Same initiative, also open: 25820
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission has launched an initiative to review Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The initiative aims to simplify, clarify, and modernize the existing rules to reduce litigation costs, address legal fragmentation, and support the EU single market and competitiveness. It will be supported by a back-to-back evaluation and impact assessment, with a legislative proposal planned for the fourth quarter of 2027. The review addresses challenges identified in an application report, stakeholder consultations, and Court of Justice case law.
- Review and potential legislative amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
- Address inconsistent jurisdiction rules, particularly for defendants outside the EU.
- Improve procedural tools for collective redress and assess aspects relevant to strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPs).
- Evaluate parallel cross-border enforcement mechanisms under Regulation (EC) 805/2004.
- Consider policy options ranging from the baseline scenario to targeted clarification, simplification, and modernization.
- Planned adoption of the initiative in the fourth quarter of 2027.
What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide views on the Commission's understanding of the problem and possible solutions, and to give any relevant information including on the possible impacts of the different options.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
In this context, the Regulation is a key enabler for the EU’s single market, including by creating an attractive business environment, and for the EU’s competitiveness, as recognised most recently in the Commission’s Communication towards a 28th regime for EU companies (COM(2026) 320 final). The Report on the application of the Brussels Ia Regulation (the Application Report) found that after over 10 years, the Regulation largely meets its goals of legal certainty and streamlined enforcement but identified areas that could benefit from clarification, simplification and modernisation. For example, the Application Report noted inconsistent jurisdiction rules for defendants outside the EU, creating an uneven playing field; it referred to the possible simplification of the jurisdictional rules concerning contractual and tort claims as well as of the specific provisions on consumer contracts;
Recast of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament..., page 1 (EN)TITLE OF THE INITIATIVE Review of EU rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters LEAD DG - RESPONSIBLE UNIT DG JUST (Unit A2) LIKELY TYPE OF INITIATIVE Legislative proposal amending Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) INDICATIVE PLANNING Q4-2027 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters | European e- Justice Portal
Recast of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament..., page 1 (EN)• the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws and 2 Joint Communication of the European Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy European Democracy Shield: Empowering Strong and Resilient Democracies, JOIN(2025)791 final, fn.81.
Recast of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament..., page 2 (EN)
Who has already answered
16 submissions in the snapshot (8 from organisations), portal total 16. Feedback list on the portal.
8 of 8 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: wants changes 8
-
- Provide for a single forum for the provision of services and define it with sufficient clarity to ensure legal certainty.
In view of the ambiguity and the considerable dependence on the opinion of the court concerned, it is necessary, in accordance with the principle of legal certainty to which R 1215/2012 acquiesces, to provide for a single forum and to define it with sufficient clarity.
machine translation by the Commission, original in PL - Make certificates needed to enforce a judgment abroad multilingual from the outset to avoid translation costs.
Certificates needed to enforce a judgment abroad should be multilingual from the outset, such as multilingual death certificates.
machine translation by the Commission, original in PL - Supplement Article 17 by consumer relations to simplify determining the competent court in the event of compensation by air.
Article 17 should be supplemented by consumer relations, which are currently governed by the section of the contract of carriage, which makes it quite difficult to determine the competent court in the event of compensation by air
machine translation by the Commission, original in PL
- Provide for a single forum for the provision of services and define it with sufficient clarity to ensure legal certainty.
-
Bundesverband ANUAS e.V. - HO für Mit-Opfer von Tötungsdelikten NGO, DEU model reads as: wants changes source
- ANUAS suggests evaluating Article 7(2) and (3) also from the perspective of victims of serious acts of violence and co-victims of homicide.
ANUAS therefore suggests expressly evaluating Article 7(2) and (3) also from the perspective of victims of serious acts of violence and co-victims of homicide.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE - The organisation recommends the introduction of more uniform European rules on jurisdiction and consideration of a narrowly circumscribed forum necessitatis.
More uniform European rules on jurisdiction and consideration of a narrowly circumscribed forum necessitatis therefore seem appropriate.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE - ANUAS recommends that access to justice for victims of serious crime be included in the review as a separate assessment criterion and that cross-border enforcement channels be simplified.
ANUAS therefore recommends, in particular, that access to justice for victims of serious crime be included in the review as a separate assessment criterion, that Article 7(3) be examined separately from the perspective of victims, that cross-border enforcement channels be simplified and that victims’ organisations be systematically included in the further impact assessment.
machine translation by the Commission, original in DE
- ANUAS suggests evaluating Article 7(2) and (3) also from the perspective of victims of serious acts of violence and co-victims of homicide.
-
DigitalTrade4.EU Other, EST; register: Other organisations, public or mixed entities model reads as: wants changes source
- Consider trusted, machine-verifiable judicial status information as part of the modernisation review.
We recommend that the review consider trusted, machine-verifiable judicial status information as part of this modernisation.
- Measure end-to-end enforcement friction in the impact assessment.
The impact assessment should also measure end-to-end enforcement friction, including verification time, procedural exceptions, legal cost, enforcement duration and the period during which claims, receivables or collateral remain economically unresolved.
- Use identified material interoperability gaps to inform Horizon Europe 2028+ and related EU R&I priorities.
Where material interoperability gaps are identified, they should inform Horizon Europe 2028+ and related EU R&I priorities, supporting cross-border pilots on trusted judicial-status interoperability before wider deployment.
- Consider trusted, machine-verifiable judicial status information as part of the modernisation review.
5 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jun 2026 | President Ursula von der Leyen | Aercap Holdings NV (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU Taxonomy Regulation |
| 20 May 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (Trade and business associations) | A simpler, clearer and better enforced EU rulebook |
| 14 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) | BDI-Proposal: European regulation establishing uniform European administrative procedural rules for permitting and notification procedures |
| 24 Jun 2025 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | EUROGAS (Trade and business associations) | Implementation of EU legislation |
| 11 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Human Bridge Stiftelse (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar); Energiföretagen / Swedenergy (Trade and business associations); Stora Enso Oyj (Companies & groups); Avfall Sverige (Trade and business associations) | Exchange of views on implementation of EU legislation. |
| 26 May 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Bundesverband Güterkraftverkehr Logistik und Entsorgung (BGL) e.V. (Trade and business associations) | Regulatory developments in the EU Transport Sector |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Roblox Corporation (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Electronic Arts Inc. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Google Ireland Limited and its affiliates (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Meta Platforms Ireland Limited and its various subsidiaries (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Apple Inc. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Anthropic, PBC (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
Showing 12 of 60.
VAT and circular economy The consultation affects consumers' access to second-hand goods and sustainable consumption choices, which sits within BEUC's consumer representation mission, though the VAT rules themselves are a technical tax matter.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
Same initiative, also open: 25912
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission has launched a call for evidence for an evaluation and impact assessment running in parallel regarding VAT rules and the circular economy. The initiative aims to modernise selected value added tax rules that currently hinder circular business models, sustainable consumption choices, and the single market for secondary raw materials. It focuses on three specific pillars: second-hand goods, the donation versus destruction of viable goods, and VAT deduction rules for passenger cars. A legislative proposal is indicatively planned for the second quarter of 2027.
- Evaluates and reviews current EU VAT rules to ensure they align with the circular economy and complement the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the Circular Economy Act.
- Examines the VAT treatment of second-hand, refurbished, and remanufactured goods to address lack of deduction rights and complex margin schemes.
- Addresses economic distortions where destroying viable goods is more advantageous under current VAT rules than donating them.
- Considers aligning VAT deduction rules for passenger cars with sustainability objectives and zero-emission mobility goals.
- Assesses policy options including mandatory or discretionary measures on vehicle deductions, harmonised margin schemes, and VAT relief on donations.
What is asked: The Commission asks respondents to provide feedback and evidence on the evaluation of current VAT rules and the impact assessment of potential policy options regarding second-hand goods, the donation or destruction of viable goods, and VAT deduction rules for passenger cars.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
Reducing resource dependencies and keeping materials in productive use for longer are important not only for achieving the EU’s environmental objectives, but also for improving its industrial competitiveness and economic security. This is reflected in the Clean Industrial Deal, in which the Commission identified circularity as one of the key enablers of a competitive and decarbonised European economy and announced a future ‘green VAT initiative’ (also referred to as ‘Circular VAT’). The importance of the circular economy for achieving the EU’s ambition to boost competitiveness and economic security will also be reflected in the forthcoming Circular Economy Act (CEA), which is intended to strengthen the single market for secondary raw materials and is scheduled for adoption in late 2026.
Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as..., page 1 (EN)The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which entered into force in 2024 and is being progressively implemented, is a key instrument for making environmentally sustainable and circular products the norm. By establishing requirements relating to durability, repairability and reusability, which thereby support the repair- and second-hand markets, it prolongs product life and encourages customers to make more sustainable choices. In addition, the ESPR also addresses the destruction of unsold but viable consumer products by requiring economic operators to take all necessary measures to prevent them having 1 Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/112/oj) Ref. Ares(2026)8589104 - 09/09/2026
Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as..., page 1 (EN)3. Passenger cars: As a result of the current VAT deduction rules being outdated and highly fragmented, there are limited incentives for businesses to choose less-polluting passenger cars. The drivers of the problems this initiative seeks to address are outlined below: 1. Current VAT rules: the current rules were designed decades ago for linear economic models and do not always adequately accommodate economic activities which could support the circular economy such as the reuse, refurbishment, remanufacturing, repair or donation of goods. 2. Evolving business models and practices: economic activities are increasingly supporting the circular economy. The market for second-hand, refurbished and remanufactured products is a significant and expanding segment of the EU economy.
Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as..., page 3 (EN)
Who has already answered
22 submissions in the snapshot (13 from organisations), portal total 22. Feedback list on the portal.
13 of 13 organisation submissions analysed; the model reads them as: supports 1 wants changes 12
-
- Extend the right to deduct VAT and the simplification and harmonisation of the margin scheme to all second-hand tyres in all segments.
we fully support the extension of the right to deduct VAT and the simplification/harmonisation of the margin scheme to all second-hand tyres in all segments (light and heavy vehicles).
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Include heavy goods vehicle tyre retreading within the scope of remanufactured goods eligible for the new VAT regime.
we fully support the inclusion of PL retreading within the scope of “remanufactured goods” eligible for the new VAT regime.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR - Exclude light vehicle tyre retreading from the favourable VAT regime until a reliable technical benchmark for retreadability exists.
we do not support, at this stage, the inclusion of VL retreading in this same favourable regime.
machine translation by the Commission, original in FR
- Extend the right to deduct VAT and the simplification and harmonisation of the margin scheme to all second-hand tyres in all segments.
-
- Upcycling should be explicitly recognized as a distinct circular economic activity rather than being treated like simple second-hand resale.
UPCYCLING should be recognised as a distinct circular economic activity.
- The VAT system should be adjusted so it does not disadvantage businesses that use existing materials.
The VAT system should not disadvantage businesses that use existing materials.
- The administrative burden of the VAT framework must be simplified to accommodate micro-businesses and artists.
The administrative system should recognise this reality. A circular VAT framework should be simple enough for a one-person business or small creative studio to use correctly without requiring disproportionate accounting resources.
- Upcycling should be explicitly recognized as a distinct circular economic activity rather than being treated like simple second-hand resale.
-
Universidad Complutense de Madrid Academic or research institution, ESP model reads as: wants changes source
- Establish tax neutrality to remove bureaucratic barriers between refurbished and new goods.
there is an urgent need to establish true tax neutrality that removes bureaucratic barriers on refurbished versus new goods.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Abolish the right of deduction for the destruction of viable goods and facilitate donation through harmonised exemptions.
It is also imperative to abolish the right of deduction for the destruction of viable goods, facilitating donation instead through harmonised exemptions.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES - Make deductions for passenger cars exclusively conditional on zero-emission vehicles to decarbonise corporate mobility.
Finally, to decarbonise corporate mobility, the new framework should make deductions for passenger cars exclusively conditional on zero-emission vehicles.
machine translation by the Commission, original in ES
- Establish tax neutrality to remove bureaucratic barriers between refurbished and new goods.
10 more analysed submissions on the consultation page.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Norsk Hydro (Companies & groups) | Circular Economy Act - End-of-Life Vehicles Regulation |
| 21 Mar 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Fédération Internationale des Véhicules Anciens (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Upcoming End-of-Life Vehicle Regulation, Circular Economy Act and REACH |
| 23 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Dan Jørgensen | Europex - Association of European Energy Exchanges (Trade and business associations) | Protection of EU wholesale energy and environmental markets against VAT fraud |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Verband Österreichischer Entsorgungsbetriebe (Trade and business associations) | Exchange with VOEB Board on the circularity priorities for the mandate |
| 12 Mar 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative (Trade and business associations) | Discussion on the upcoming Circular Economy Act |
| 3 Jul 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Landbell Aktiengesellschaft für Rückhol-Systeme (Companies & groups) | Discussion on the Circular Economy Act |
| 4 Mar 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Novelis Europe (Companies & groups) | Circular Economy Act and End-of Life Vehicles |
| 10 Jun 2025 | Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné | Paprec Group (Companies & groups) | Circular Economy Act, ETS for municipal waste incineration |
| 23 Jun 2025 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Plastics Recyclers Europe (Trade and business associations) | The upcoming Circular Economy Act, enforcement of environmental legislation; simplification (together with Cab Ribera) |
| 2 Jul 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Notre Europe - Institut Jacques Delors / Notre Europe - Jacques Delors Institute (Think tanks and research institutions) | circular economy act |
| 26 May 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | H/Advisors (Professional consultancies); Veolia Environnement (Companies & groups) | circular economy act |
| 4 Feb 2025 | Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen | Car Rental Coalition (Trade and business associations) | Car Rental Coalition’s view on Commission initiatives |
Showing 12 of 60.
Evaluation of the Balanced Approach Regulation on noise at EU airports Airport noise management touches environmental and local resident interests but is peripheral to general consumer market rights.
Full consultation page Answer on the Commission's site
Little to show yet: no Commission document attached and no organisation submission with readable text. Open for the summary and the meetings.
What the Commission proposes
The European Commission has launched a public consultation to evaluate the Balanced Approach Regulation on noise at EU airports. This regulation provides a framework for Member States to manage aviation noise and increase the sustainability of air transport. The evaluation assesses whether the current rules have successfully achieved their objectives and remain fit for purpose. It examines how the framework balances noise mitigation with the economic impact on stakeholders.
- Evaluates the Balanced Approach Regulation governing noise at EU airports
- Assesses whether the regulation has achieved its objective
- Examines if the framework is still fit for purpose
- Considers the balance between air transport sustainability and economic impacts on stakeholders
What is asked: Respondents are asked to provide feedback on the performance, effectiveness, and continued relevance of the Balanced Approach Regulation.
Summary written by AI from the Commission's document.
Key passages on your topics
The Commission has not attached a document yet.
Who has already answered
22 submissions in the snapshot (3 from organisations), portal total 22. Feedback list on the portal.
3 organisation submissions, none with readable text, so not analysed.
Who met the Commission about it
60 meetings, approximate
subject match, approximate The top 60 cabinet meetings by similarity (the list stops at 60) whose recorded subject is close to this consultation's title and summary (embedding similarity at 0.45 or more, cached from the nightly map). Generic subjects such as "exchange of views on EU regulation" also pass, so read this as a lead, not a finding. Source: Commission meetings file, portal.
| Date | Cabinet | Interest representative | Subject as recorded |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 May 2026 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | Bundesverband Güterkraftverkehr Logistik und Entsorgung (BGL) e.V. (Trade and business associations) | Regulatory developments in the EU Transport Sector |
| 8 Jul 2025 | Commissioner Costas Kadis | Environmental Justice Foundation (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Implementation of the Control Regulation |
| 3 Jun 2026 | Commissioner Costas Kadis | Association of National Organisations of Fishing Enterprises in the European Union (Trade and business associations) | Control Regulation - weighing implementing act |
| 23 Jan 2026 | Commissioner Dan Jørgensen | Ecologic Institute (Think tanks and research institutions) | Governance regulation review |
| 14 Sep 2026 | Commissioner Jessika Roswall | Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V. (Trade and business associations) | BDI-Proposal: European regulation establishing uniform European administrative procedural rules for permitting and notification procedures |
| 4 Nov 2025 | Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis | LVMH - Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton (Companies & groups) | Regulatory simplification and implementation |
| 23 Apr 2026 | Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribera Rodríguez | ClientEarth AISBL (Non-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar) | Better Regulation, impact assessments, and consultation practices |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Roblox Corporation (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Google Ireland Limited and its affiliates (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Meta Platforms Ireland Limited and its various subsidiaries (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Electronic Arts Inc. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
| 16 Apr 2026 | Commissioner Michael McGrath | Apple Inc. (Companies & groups) | Exchange of views on EU regulation (implementation and development) and digital policy |
Showing 12 of 60.